209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22432591)
1. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions.
Pangrazio MN; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Bayirli B; Movahhedian A
Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):971-7. PubMed ID: 22432591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study.
Al-Jewair T; Ghorbaniparvar M; Franchi L; Flores-Mir C
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 32111577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the MARA and the AdvanSync functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Al-Jewair TS; Preston CB; Moll EM; Dischinger T
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 22214390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
Siara-Olds NJ; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger J; Bayirli B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion.
Gönner U; Ozkan V; Jahn E; Toll DE
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Sep; 68(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 17882366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class II correction in orthodontic patients utilizing the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA).
Ardeshna A; Bogdan F; Jiang S
Angle Orthod; 2019 May; 89(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 30605017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment effects of the MARA appliance and Activator-Headgear combined with fixed appliances in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients: A retrospective longitudinal study.
Brito DBA; Bellini-Pereira SA; Fonçatti CF; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 27(6):e2221174. PubMed ID: 36995843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the Forsus fatigue-resistant device and mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Nogueira CQ; Galvão Chiqueto KF; Freire Fernandes TM; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Dec; 162(6):814-823. PubMed ID: 36202700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion.
Ghislanzoni LT; Baccetti T; Toll D; Defraia E; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 22423185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
