These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22432591)

  • 21. Three-dimensional Evaluation of the Carriere Motion 3D Appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Biggs EV; Benavides E; McNamara JA; Cevidanes LHS; Copello F; Lints RR; Lints JP; Ruellas ACO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Dec; 164(6):824-836. PubMed ID: 37598337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Angle Class II correction with MARA appliance.
    Chiqueto K; Henriques JF; Barros SE; Janson G
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 23876947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Class II malocclusion treatment effects with Jones Jig and Distal Jet followed by fixed appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Patel MP; Reis RS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 28985105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment.
    Angelieri F; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH; Scanavini MA; McNamara JA
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 23736378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances.
    Buongiorno M; Iacopetti F; Beretta M; Lanteri C; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 23260532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis on the mandibular dimensions effects of the MARA appliance in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Al-Jewair TS
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 25181253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teeth angulations after class II treatment with the Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective panoramic analysis.
    Bellini-Pereira SA; Sant'Anna GQ; Wagner MC; Aliaga-DelCastillo A; Patel MP; Henriques JFC; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 32753335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
    Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
    Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.