562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22432630)
1. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-in-one fuel combining sugar cane with low rank coal and its CO₂ reduction effects in pulverized-coal power plants.
Lee DW; Bae JS; Lee YJ; Park SJ; Hong JC; Lee BH; Jeon CH; Choi YC
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1704-10. PubMed ID: 23286316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turning carbon dioxide into fuel.
Jiang Z; Xiao T; Kuznetsov VL; Edwards PP
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jul; 368(1923):3343-64. PubMed ID: 20566515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
Sathre R; Masanet E
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Densified biomass can cost-effectively mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and address energy security in thermal applications.
Wilson TO; McNeal FM; Spatari S; G Abler D; Adler PR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1270-7. PubMed ID: 22107056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospects and issues of integration of co-combustion of solid fuels (coal and biomass) in chemical looping technology.
Bhui B; Vairakannu P
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():1241-1256. PubMed ID: 30602249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
Whittington HW
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrogen: Its Future Role in the Nation's Energy Economy.
Winsche WE; Hoffman KC; Salzano FJ
Science; 1973 Jun; 180(4093):1325-32. PubMed ID: 17831094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Production of bio-synthetic natural gas in Canada.
Hacatoglu K; McLellan PJ; Layzell DB
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 20175525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective.
Steubing B; Zah R; Ludwig C
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 22091634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Co-gasification of solid waste and lignite - a case study for Western Macedonia.
Koukouzas N; Katsiadakis A; Karlopoulos E; Kakaras E
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1263-75. PubMed ID: 17631995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of fuel-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for Fischer-Tropsch diesel from coal and cellulosic biomass.
Xie X; Wang M; Han J
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3047-53. PubMed ID: 21370852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can hybrid solar-fossil power plants mitigate CO2 at lower cost than PV or CSP?
Moore J; Apt J
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2487-93. PubMed ID: 23379665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
