These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22433322)

  • 1. A study of the face recognition ability of orthodontists and lay persons of different age groups.
    Walker R; Stokes M; Socker M; Collins M
    J Orthod; 2012 Mar; 39(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22433322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessed facial normality after Twin Block therapy.
    Sattarzadeh AP; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 20133514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.
    Kiekens RM; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maltha JC
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 17290021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual perception of skeletal class and biotype in Spain.
    Romero-Maroto M; Nieto-Sánchez I; Míguez-Contreras M; López-de-Andrés A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 21562071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Facial profile preference among four panels].
    Wang Y; Liao ZY; Lai WL; Yang Z; Zhao ZH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):468-71. PubMed ID: 19087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial recognition software success rates for the identification of 3D surface reconstructed facial images: implications for patient privacy and security.
    Mazura JC; Juluru K; Chen JJ; Morgan TA; John M; Siegel EL
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Jun; 25(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 22065158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry.
    Jackson TH; Mitroff SR; Clark K; Proffit WR; Lee JY; Nguyen TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 24182582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.