173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22433334)
21. Participation of the general gynecologist in surgical staging of endometrial cancer: analysis of cost and perioperative outcomes.
Hoekstra A; Singh DK; Garb M; Arekapudi S; Rademaker A; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):897-901. PubMed ID: 16814370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Yu X; Lum D; Kiet TK; Fuh KC; Orr J; Brooks RA; Ueda SM; Chen LM; Kapp DS; Chan JK
J Surg Oncol; 2013 May; 107(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 23129514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay.
Woo YJ; Nacke EA
Surgery; 2006 Aug; 140(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 16904978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review.
Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Yim GW; Kim YT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22123220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in the obese: a fifteen-year cohort study.
Rabischong B; Larraín D; Canis M; Le Bouëdec G; Pomel C; Jardon K; Kwiatkowski F; Bourdel N; Achard JL; Dauplat J; Mage G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 21719359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: feasibility and results.
Volpi E; Ferrero A; Jacomuzzi ME; Carus AP; Fuso L; Martra F; Sismondi P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Feb; 124(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 16095803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study.
Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Fanfani F; Salerno MG; Ercoli A; D'Asta M; Tortorella L; Turco LC; Escobar P; Scambia G
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 22391483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
