BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22433340)

  • 1. Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women.
    Tyler CP; Whiteman MK; Zapata LB; Curtis KM; Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):762-71. PubMed ID: 22433340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Healthcare Provider Attitudes of Safety of Intrauterine Devices in the Postpartum Period.
    Rauh-Benoit LA; Tepper NK; Zapata LB; Whiteman MK; Curtis KM; Mandel MG; Marchbanks PA; Jamieson DJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Jul; 26(7):768-773. PubMed ID: 27992305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misconceptions and Beliefs Regarding the Use of Intrauterine Devices for Nulliparous Women Among Chinese Health Care Providers.
    Wang Z; Yuan W; Tu X; Liang H; Miao M; Cheng Y; Jin L; Lou C
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 33(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 31648037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.
    Harper CC; Blum M; de Bocanegra HT; Darney PD; Speidel JJ; Policar M; Drey EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1359-69. PubMed ID: 18515520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine contraception: the role of general practitioners in four Dutch general practices.
    Vos AA; Veldhuis HM; Lagro-Janssen TL
    Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 15033402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations.
    Luchowski AT; Anderson BL; Power ML; Raglan GB; Espey E; Schulkin J
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 24679477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV.
    Simmons KB; Zapata L; Curtis KM
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Jun; 50(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 29603597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Healthcare Provider Attitudes Regarding Contraception for Women with Obesity.
    Jatlaoui TC; Zapata LB; Curtis KM; Folger SG; Marchbanks PA; Mandel MG; Jamieson DJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Aug; 26(8):870-877. PubMed ID: 28140761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25601352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
    Finger WR; Barr D
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects.
    Hubacher D
    Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Suppl):S8-11. PubMed ID: 17531622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New developments in intrauterine devices.
    Farr G
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 12284281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
    Finger WR
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women among Chinese health care providers.
    Wang Z; Lou C; Jin L; Miao M; Tu X; Liang H; Cheng Y; Yuan W
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 30704499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinician knowledge about use of intrauterine devices in adolescents in South Carolina AHEC.
    Diaz VA; Hughes N; Dickerson LM; Wessell AM; Carek PJ
    Fam Med; 2011 Jun; 43(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 21656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales.
    Weisberg E; Fraser IS; Goss S
    Med J Aust; 1994 Jan; 160(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8271978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.