850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22433762)
1. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to the EQ-5D utility index.
Cheung YB; Thumboo J; Gao F; Ng GY; Pang G; Koo WH; Sethi VK; Wee J; Goh C
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 18783392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping the FACT-P to the preference-based EQ-5D questionnaire in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Skaltsa K; Longworth L; Ivanescu C; Phung D; Holmstrom S
Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 24636382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of EQ-5D US preference weights in liver transplant candidates and recipients.
Russell RT; Feurer ID; Wisawatapnimit P; Pinson CW
Liver Transpl; 2009 Jan; 15(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19109831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.
Hawton A; Green C; Telford C; Zajicek J; Wright D
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1084-91. PubMed ID: 23244811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of EQ-5D utility indices in alcohol-dependent patients.
Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2008 Jan; 92(1-3):291-5. PubMed ID: 17888587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) to EQ-5D utility scores.
Kay S; Ferreira A
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 21(2):66-78. PubMed ID: 24568628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions.
Nan Luo ; Johnson JA; Shaw JW; Coons SJ
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 17545501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the performance of algorithms mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D index in a metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness model.
Franken MD; de Hond A; Degeling K; Punt CJA; Koopman M; Uyl-de Groot CA; Versteegh MM; van Oijen MGH
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 18(1):240. PubMed ID: 32690011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
J Affect Disord; 2008 Jan; 105(1-3):81-91. PubMed ID: 17532051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.
Ariza-Ariza R; Hernández-Cruz B; Carmona L; Dolores Ruiz-Montesinos M; Ballina J; Navarro-Sarabia F;
Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Oct; 55(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 17013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tails from the peak district: adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models of EQ-5D questionnaire health state utility values.
Hernández Alava M; Wailoo AJ; Ara R
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):550-61. PubMed ID: 22583466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.
Jia H; Zack MM; Moriarty DG; Fryback DG
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):174-85. PubMed ID: 20375418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O in an older post-acute patient population relative to the general population.
Couzner L; Crotty M; Norman R; Ratcliffe J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 23807538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping function from FACT-B to EQ-5D-5 L using multiple modelling approaches: data from breast cancer patients in China.
Yang Q; Yu XX; Zhang W; Li H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Oct; 17(1):153. PubMed ID: 31615531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
