These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22434065)

  • 1. Subsurface atomic force microscopy: towards a quantitative understanding.
    Verbiest GJ; Simon JN; Oosterkamp TH; Rost MJ
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Apr; 23(14):145704. PubMed ID: 22434065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visualizing the subsurface of soft matter: simultaneous topographical imaging, depth modulation, and compositional mapping with triple frequency atomic force microscopy.
    Ebeling D; Eslami B; Solares Sde J
    ACS Nano; 2013 Nov; 7(11):10387-96. PubMed ID: 24131492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cantilever dynamics in Heterodyne Force Microscopy.
    Verbiest GJ; Oosterkamp TH; Rost MJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Dec; 135():113-20. PubMed ID: 23995285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flow patterns and transport in Rayleigh surface acoustic wave streaming: combined finite element method and raytracing numerics versus experiments.
    Frommelt T; Gogel D; Kostur M; Talkner P; Hänggi P; Wixforth A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2298-305. PubMed ID: 18986877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of Au nanoparticles deeply buried in polymer matrix by various atomic force microscopy techniques.
    Kimura K; Kobayashi K; Matsushige K; Yamada H
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Oct; 133():41-9. PubMed ID: 23770541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the macroscopic shape of the tip on the contrast in scanning polarization force microscopy images.
    Sacha GM; Cardellach M; Segura JJ; Moser J; Bachtold A; Fraxedas J; Verdaguer A
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Jul; 20(28):285704. PubMed ID: 19550016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast inversion in electrostatic force microscopy imaging of trapped charges: tip-sample distance and dielectric constant dependence.
    Riedel C; Alegría A; Arinero R; Colmenero J; Sáenz JJ
    Nanotechnology; 2011 Aug; 22(34):345702. PubMed ID: 21795775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical and numerical calculations for the time-averaged acoustic force and torque acting on a rigid cylinder of arbitrary size in a low viscosity fluid.
    Wang J; Dual J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3490-501. PubMed ID: 21682376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling of surface nanoparticle inclusions for nanomechanical measurements by an AFM or nanoindenter: spatial issues.
    Clifford CA; Seah MP
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Apr; 23(16):165704. PubMed ID: 22469815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced tip design for liquid phase vibration mode atomic force microscopy.
    Muramatsu H; Yamamoto Y; Shigeno M; Shirakawabe Y; Inoue A; Kim WS; Kim SJ; Chang SM; Kim JM
    Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Mar; 611(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18328326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generalized approach for efficient finite element modeling of elastodynamic scattering in two and three dimensions.
    Velichko A; Wilcox PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1004-14. PubMed ID: 20815437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanoscale subsurface- and material-specific identification of single nanoparticles.
    Nuño Z; Hessler B; Ochoa J; Shon YS; Bonney C; Abate Y
    Opt Express; 2011 Oct; 19(21):20865-75. PubMed ID: 21997096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Broadband impedance boundary conditions for the simulation of sound propagation in the time domain.
    Bin J; Yousuff Hussaini M; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):664-75. PubMed ID: 19206844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atomic force microscopy of silica nanoparticles and carbon nanohorns in macrophages and red blood cells.
    Tetard L; Passian A; Farahi RH; Thundat T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 May; 110(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 20226593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ferroelectric domain in PMN-xPT single crystal studied by piezoresponse force microscopy and finite-element analysis.
    Wong KS; Wang B; Dai JY; Luo H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 May; 55(5):952-6. PubMed ID: 18519194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental and numerical analyses of local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for sheared endothelial cells.
    Ohashi T; Ishii Y; Ishikawa Y; Matsumoto T; Sato M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 12446947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Boundary effects on backscattering by a solid aluminum cylinder: experiment and finite element model comparisons (L).
    La Follett JR; Williams KL; Marston PL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):669-72. PubMed ID: 21877778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single biomolecule imaging with frequency and force modulation in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy.
    Solares SD
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2125-9. PubMed ID: 17291035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nanoscale mapping of contact stiffness and damping by contact resonance atomic force microscopy.
    Stan G; King SW; Cook RF
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Jun; 23(21):215703. PubMed ID: 22551825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of surface stiffness and probe-sample dissipation using the band excitation method of atomic force microscopy: a numerical analysis.
    Kareem AU; Solares SD
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):015706. PubMed ID: 22155951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.