These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243418)

  • 41. What in the world is an RCT?
    Oreg Nurse; 1988 Sep; 53(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 3186236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Administrative reviews: nursing.
    Kinsella CR
    Hospitals; 1975 Apr; 49(7):101-5. PubMed ID: 1090496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Nursing opposes RCTs. AMA proposal short-sighted, says ANA.
    Am Nurse; 1988; 20(7):2. PubMed ID: 3415084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nursing cohesiveness: can it exist with changes in entry levels into practice.
    Speake D
    Fla Nurse; 1978 Nov; 26(10):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 251521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. AMA shortage plan stirs controversy.
    Pa Nurse; 1988 Jul; 43(7):1, 15. PubMed ID: 3387111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. AMA proposal calling for new categories of licensed care givers.
    Nev Rnformation; 1988; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 3412536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stearley's slant on nursing. Restructuring and the A.N.A. Who's side are they on?
    Stearley H
    Revolution; 1994; 4(3):36-8, 40-2. PubMed ID: 7788048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Keep the pot boiling.
    Joel L
    Am Nurse; 1988 Sep; 20(9):4. PubMed ID: 3421555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Guest commentary--RCT?
    Kizilay P; Newsome GG; Skalak CH
    AD Nurse; 1988; 3(5):23. PubMed ID: 3415909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Debate over Registered Care Technologists: nurses angry, opposed to AMA proposal.
    Tex Nurs; 1988; 62(6):6, 8. PubMed ID: 3413700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. RCT proposal draws fire at hearing.
    Perrin N
    Am Nurse; 1988; 20(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 3415089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Taft-Hartley amended: implications for nursing. The professional model.
    Cleland V
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Feb; 75(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 1037798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. President's perspective. Ingredients of power: a government perspective.
    Joel L
    Am Nurse; 1989 Jan; 21(1):10. PubMed ID: 2910172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The nurse as a professional and as a unionist.
    Epstein RL; Stickler KB
    Hospitals; 1976 Jan; 50(2):44-8, 108. PubMed ID: 1245328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. AMA proposal: questions and answers.
    Pelican News; 1988 Aug; 44(4):3, 5. PubMed ID: 3419869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Self management in American nursing.
    Edelstein RR
    Int Nurs Rev; 1979; 26(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 255462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nursing's response to the RCT proposal.
    Maraldo P; Binder LF
    Imprint; 1988 Nov; 35(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 3192247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Registered care technologists: the ANA response.
    Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 3405188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. AMA reports to House on RCT status.
    Am Nurse; 1989; 21(6):5. PubMed ID: 2764360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anne Arundel decision prompts action by E&GW Commission.
    Loveless J
    Am Nurse; 1977 Dec; 9(12):1,8. PubMed ID: 244277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.