These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22434461)
1. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year serum metal ion levels in minimally invasive total conservative hip resurfacing: preliminary results of a prospective study. Tai SM; Millard N; Munir S; Jenabzadeh AR; Walter LR; Walter WL ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 25288230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences. Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. Langton DJ; Sprowson AP; Joyce TJ; Reed M; Carluke I; Partington P; Nargol AV J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1287-95. PubMed ID: 19794161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serum metal ion concentration: comparison between small and large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Hallows RK; Pelt CE; Erickson JA; Peters CL J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 21236627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting high blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing. Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ Hip Int; 2015; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26109153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip replacement. Schouten R; Malone AA; Tiffen C; Frampton CM; Hooper G J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11):1462-7. PubMed ID: 23109623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study of a ceramic-on-metal bearing in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical results, metal ion levels and chromosome analysis at two years. Kazi HA; Perera JR; Gillott E; Carroll FA; Briggs TW Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1040-4. PubMed ID: 23908417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The outcome and survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients aged less than 50 years: a prospective observational cohort study with minimum ten-year follow-up. Scholes CJ; Ebrahimi M; Farah SB; Field C; Cordingley R; Kerr D; Kohan L Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 30601056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA? Moroni A; Savarino L; Cadossi M; Baldini N; Giannini S Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 466(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 18196364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]