214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22435471)
1. The role of the skin irritation response in polysensitization to fragrances.
Nagtegaal MJ; Pentinga SE; Kuik J; Kezic S; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22435471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A link between skin and airways regarding sensitivity to fragrance products?
Elberling J; Linneberg A; Mosbech H; Dirksen A; Frølund L; Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Dec; 151(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 15606515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Site variations in susceptibility to SLS.
Bock M; Wulfhorst B; John SM
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 17627647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive.
Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 21943251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.
Koopman DG; Kezić S; Verberk MM
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15030332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact allergy to individual fragrance mix constituents in relation to primary site of dermatitis.
Buckley DA; Rycroft RJ; White IR; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Nov; 43(5):304-5. PubMed ID: 11016673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.
Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of a detergent on skin response to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in sensitized individuals.
Pedersen LK; Haslund P; Johansen JD; Held E; Vølund A; Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15059095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.
Bagley DM; Boisits EK; Spriggs TL; Schwartz S
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11244136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
