These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22436256)
1. Case histories as evidence. Herxheimer A; Healy D; Menkes DB Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22436256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of pharmacological evidence for forensic purposes. Aronson JK Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 22436254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toxicological evidence in forensic pharmacology. Ferner RE Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22436255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presenting evidence for the court. Hartigan-Go K Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 22436261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The privilege against self-incrimination in coroners' inquests. Freckelton I J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):491-505. PubMed ID: 25980183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiological evidence in forensic pharmacovigilance. Persaud N; Healy D Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22436257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence. Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images. Edmond G Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge. Klee CH; Friedman HJ NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The court appointment of expert witnesses in the United States: a failed experiment. Imwinkelried EJ Med Law; 1989; 8(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 2517994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic pharmacovigilance and substandard or counterfeit drugs. Labadie J Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 22436258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic pharmacovigilance. Edwards IR; Body D Int J Risk Saf Med; 2012; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22436253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes]. Chowaniec C; Nowak A; Chowaniec M; Kobek M Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 16498966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the forensic expert in criminal procedures according to Belgian Law. Vermylen Y Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):8-13. PubMed ID: 20471763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dichotomy of the expert witness. Howard LB J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jan; 31(1):337-41. PubMed ID: 3944576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]