These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22436409)
1. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones. Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone. Munro KJ; Agnew N Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry. Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold. Berger EH; Killion MC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears? Voss SE; Herrmann BS Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement. Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants. Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones. Lindgren F Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an aided TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Marriage J; Moore BC; Ogg V; Stone MA Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 18344872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds. Frank T; Williams DL J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing thresholds for speech using insert earphones versus supra-aural earphones. Arlinger SD; Billermark E Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 9309810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone. Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry. Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds. Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]