140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22436409)
21. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of Smartphone Self-Hearing Test Applications Across Frequencies and Earphone Styles in Adults.
Barczik J; Serpanos YC
Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):570-580. PubMed ID: 30242342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
Poulsen T; Oakley S
Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attenuation values for a supra-aural earphone for children and insert earphone for children and adults.
Wright DC; Frank T
Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 1487107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of audiometric thresholds obtained with insert earphones when used by certified audiometric technicians.
Bell-Lehmkuhler B; Meinke DK; Sedey A; Tuell C
Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):59-68. PubMed ID: 19265255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
Vinay ; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 17496673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
Margolis RH; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
Frank T
Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Threshold Equalizing Noise Test Reveals Suprathreshold Loss of Hearing Function, Even in the "Normal" Audiogram Range.
Stone MA; Perugia E; Bakay W; Lough M; Whiston H; Plack CJ
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1208-1221. PubMed ID: 35276701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
Norrix LW; Anderson A
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
Moore BC; Killen T; Munro KJ
Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):465-74. PubMed ID: 14658854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions.
Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R
Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz.
Han LA; Poulsen T
Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9638829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.
Elberling C; Kristensen SG; Don M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2091-100. PubMed ID: 22423705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of the type of transducer in profound hearing loss.
Marangoni AT; Gil D
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 19838564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Air conduction, bone conduction, and soft tissue conduction audiograms in normal hearing and simulated hearing losses.
Adelman C; Cohen A; Regev-Cohen A; Chordekar S; Fraenkel R; Sohmer H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 25597465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
