These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22436940)

  • 1. Committee calls for framework to assess the safety of nanotechnology materials.
    Mitka M
    JAMA; 2012 Mar; 307(11):1123-4. PubMed ID: 22436940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N; Carley S; Handy RD; Kapustka L; Nowack B; von der Kammer F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22162122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science policy. Report faults U.S. strategy for nanotoxicology research.
    Service RF
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1779. PubMed ID: 19095914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of nanomaterials.
    Foth H; Stewart JD; Gebel T; Bolt HM
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 86(7):983-4. PubMed ID: 22733142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nanotechnology in cosmetics.
    Katz LM; Dewan K; Bronaugh RL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 85():127-37. PubMed ID: 26159063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology.
    Godwin HA; Chopra K; Bradley KA; Cohen Y; Harthorn BH; Hoek EM; Holden P; Keller AA; Lenihan HS; Nisbet RM; Nel AE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6453-7. PubMed ID: 19764201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to solve complex nano EHS problems by the UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology.
    Xia T; Malasarn D; Lin S; Ji Z; Zhang H; Miller RJ; Keller AA; Nisbet RM; Harthorn BH; Godwin HA; Lenihan HS; Liu R; Gardea-Torresdey J; Cohen Y; Mädler L; Holden PA; Zink JI; Nel AE
    Small; 2013 May; 9(9-10):1428-43. PubMed ID: 23027589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental nanotechnology: a near-term opportunity assessment.
    Huang CP; Phillips DC
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Sep; 79(9):939. PubMed ID: 17910360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ONE Nano: NIEHS's strategic initiative on the health and safety effects of engineered nanomaterials.
    Schug TT; Johnson AF; Balshaw DM; Garantziotis S; Walker NJ; Weis C; Nadadur SS; Birnbaum LS
    Environ Health Perspect; 2013 Apr; 121(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 23407114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US panel split on endocrine disruptors..
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6705):828. PubMed ID: 9804404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nanomaterials meet increased scrutiny.
    Christen K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(3):671-2. PubMed ID: 17328164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The hierarchy of environmental health and safety practices in the U.S. nanotechnology workplace.
    Engeman CD; Baumgartner L; Carr BM; Fish AM; Meyerhofer JD; Satterfield TA; Holden PA; Harthorn BH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 23927041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need for novel approaches in ecotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials.
    Kumar A; Dhawan A; Shanker R
    J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2011 Feb; 7(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 21485813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bridging the divide between human and environmental nanotoxicology.
    Malysheva A; Lombi E; Voelcker NH
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2015 Oct; 10(10):835-44. PubMed ID: 26440721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanotechnology: looking as we leap.
    Hood E
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Sep; 112(13):A740-9. PubMed ID: 15345364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, Part I: evaluating the human health implications of exposure to nanoscale materials.
    Thomas K; Sayre P
    Toxicol Sci; 2005 Oct; 87(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 16049265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The NAS perchlorate review: adverse effects?
    Johnston RB; Corley R; Cowan L; Utiger RD
    Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A728-9; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16276624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The NAS perchlorate review: is the RfD acceptable?
    Strawson J; Dourson ML; Zhao QJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A729-30; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16276625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The NAS perchlorate review: second-guessing the experts.
    Gibbs JP; Engel A; Lamm SH
    Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Nov; 113(11):A727-8; author reply A730-2. PubMed ID: 16263491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanotechnology applications and implications research supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grants program.
    Savage N; Thomas TA; Duncan JS
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Oct; 9(10):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17909637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.