These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243762)

  • 1. Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.
    Paquet L; Lortie C
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 2243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.
    Paquet L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 11495118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination.
    Cheal ML; Lyon DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Dec; 81(3):243-67. PubMed ID: 1462787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priming effects in perceptual classification.
    Flowers JH
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 2304812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-cuing target location reduces interference but not negative priming from visual distractors.
    Fox E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 7754085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words.
    Judge J; Taylor PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2008-17. PubMed ID: 22524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: evidence for a failure of selective attention.
    Schmidt PA; Dark VJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 9529907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task.
    Vierck E; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.
    McCann RS; Folk CL; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1015-29. PubMed ID: 1431741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primes and flankers: source confusions and discounting.
    Denton SE; Shiffrin RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 22528611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: an early-selection account of selective attention failures.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Jung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1257-73. PubMed ID: 24730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms for precuing superiority in visual recognition.
    Stolldorf DE; Redding GM; Manelis LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 6460085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the attention shift hypothesis as an account for the flanker sequence-based congruency modulation in spatial flanker tasks.
    Zeischka P; Deroost N; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 20923086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.