These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243763)

  • 21. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli is influenced by the type of stimulation.
    Walter-Walsh K; Weiss T; Spohn D; Torma F; Miltner WH
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1281():47-57. PubMed ID: 19497308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. SmartTouch: Electric skin to touch the untouchable.
    Kajimoto H; Kawakami N; Tachi S; Inami M
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2004; 24(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15384666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
    Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence on touch, vibration and cutaneous pain of dorsal column stimulation in man.
    Lindblom U; Meyerson BA
    Pain; 1975 Sep; 1(3):257-270. PubMed ID: 1088447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin.
    Mahns DA; Perkins NM; Sahai V; Robinson L; Rowe MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 95(3):1442-50. PubMed ID: 16319219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS.
    Ambrus GG; Paulus W; Antal A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20471313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variation between centers in electrophysiologic techniques used in lumbosacral selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy.
    Steinbok P; Kestle JR
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1996 Nov; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 9309786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skin nerve stimulation caused by low frequency electric field.
    Korniewicz HR
    Pol J Occup Med Environ Health; 1993; 6(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 8019204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A test-retest reliability study of assessing small cutaneous fibers by measuring current perception threshold with pin electrodes.
    Xia W; Fu H; Liu H; Meng F; Wang K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242490. PubMed ID: 33201884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays.
    Rizzo JF; Wyatt J; Loewenstein J; Kelly S; Shire D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 44(12):5355-61. PubMed ID: 14638738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Muscle compound motor action potentials from esophago-vertebral electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the normal awake man.
    Caccia MR; Valla PL; Osio M; Mangoni A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 10627936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Determination of electric current perception threshold in a sample of normal volunteers].
    Galvão Mde L; Manzano GM; Braga Nl; Nóbrega JA
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2005 Jun; 63(2A):289-93. PubMed ID: 16100976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Activation of ganglion cells in wild-type and P23H rat retinas with a small subretinal electrode.
    Jensen RJ
    Exp Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 99():71-7. PubMed ID: 22542904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of interstimulus interval on somatosensory point localization.
    Ylioja S; Pertovaara A; Koivisto J; Korvenoja A; Artchakov D; Carlson S
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2004 Mar; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15203968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of an extraocular retinal prosthesis: evaluation of stimulation parameters in the cat.
    Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
    J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 15(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 18586497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm.
    Geng B; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():97. PubMed ID: 24908048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The summation properties of the somatosensory system demonstrated via a study of the tactile sensations evoked by an electrical current and by focused ultrasound].
    Andreeva IG; Vartanian IA; Tsirul'nikov EM
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1991; 27(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 1897322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-related changes in tactile spatial resolution from 6 to 16 years old.
    Bleyenheuft Y; Cols C; Arnould C; Thonnard JL
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2006; 23(3-4):83-7. PubMed ID: 17178543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.