These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243763)

  • 41. Perception thresholds and qualitative perceptions for electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Dölker EM; Lau S; Bernhard MA; Haueisen J
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7335. PubMed ID: 35513410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Chai G; Sui X; Li S; He L; Lan N
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26401550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. System development for multichannel electrotactile stimulation on the lips.
    Shim JW; Liu W; Tang H
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):734-9. PubMed ID: 16386447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The contribution of membrane hyperpolarization to adaptation and conduction block in sensory neurones of the leech.
    Van Essen DC
    J Physiol; 1973 May; 230(3):509-34. PubMed ID: 4717151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study.
    Struijk JJ; Holsheimer J; Boom HB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jul; 40(7):632-9. PubMed ID: 8244424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode.
    Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8550059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes.
    Jensen RJ; Ziv OR; Rizzo JF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15790920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensorimotor integration to cutaneous afferents in humans: the effect of the size of the receptive field.
    Tamburin S; Fiaschi A; Andreoli A; Marani S; Zanette G
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 167(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 16078031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A device for measuring tactile spatiotemporal sensitivity.
    Van Doren CL; Pelli DG; Verrillo RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1906-16. PubMed ID: 3611511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrocutaneous stimulation I. The effects of stimulus parameters on absolute threshold.
    Girvin JP; Marks LE; Antunes JL; Quest DO; O'Keefe MD; Ning P; Dobelle WH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 7167349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An initial study on lip perception of electrotactile array stimulation.
    Liu W; Tang H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 16586196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of electrode size on basic excitatory responses and on selected stimulus parameters.
    Alon G; Kantor G; Ho HS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Jul; 20(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8081407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task.
    Recanzone GH; Jenkins WM; Hradek GT; Merzenich MM
    J Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 67(5):1015-30. PubMed ID: 1597695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurement of light touch perception threshold by contingent negative variation.
    Prevec TS; Berić A
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 84(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 1864334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of skin-transmitted vibration enhancement on vibrotactile perception.
    Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Sano A
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1721-31. PubMed ID: 25788007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [A method of determining thresholds for electrocutaneous stimulation of rabbits during long-term observations].
    Shevelev NA; Korneeva AN
    Nauchnye Doki Vyss Shkoly Biol Nauki; 1975; (4):136-9. PubMed ID: 1220821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.