These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243764)

  • 1. Negative priming in same-different matching: further evidence for a central locus of inhibition.
    Neill WT; Lissner LS; Beck JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):398-400. PubMed ID: 2243764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.
    Neill WT; Valdes LA; Terry KM; Gorfein DS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):993-1000. PubMed ID: 1402720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter-specific processing in children and adults matched for reading level.
    Burgund ED; Abernathy AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18544449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object-based perceptual grouping affects negative priming.
    Fuentes LJ; Humphreys GW; Agis IF; Carmona E; Catena A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):664-72. PubMed ID: 9554102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.
    Rueckl JG; Suzuki S; Yeh SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 May; 49(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 2057307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of facilitation in primed perceptual identification.
    Reinitz MT; Alexander R
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8881317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Cha KH; Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming.
    Buchner A; Zabal A; Mayr S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 15000539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 15910132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres.
    Eviatar Z; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):128-37. PubMed ID: 8043263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: where has all the inhibition gone?
    Moore CM
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Aug; 56(2):133-47. PubMed ID: 7971114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging and feature-specific priming of familiar and novel stimuli.
    Wiggs CL; Martin A
    Psychol Aging; 1994 Dec; 9(4):578-88. PubMed ID: 7893429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological signatures of masked transposition priming in a same-different task: evidence with strings of letters vs. pseudoletters.
    Muñoz S; Perea M; García-Orza J; Barber HA
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 515(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):924-41. PubMed ID: 1837304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of rotated letters: extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli.
    Koriat A; Norman J; Kimchi R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):444-57. PubMed ID: 1830087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.