114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22437768)
21. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast Cancer Screening in Morocco: Performance Indicators During Two Years of an Organized Programme.
El Fakir S; Najdi A; Khazraji YC; Bennani M; Belakhel L; Abousselham L; Lyoussi B; Bekkali R; Nejjari C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6285-8. PubMed ID: 26434830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.
Webb ML; Cady B; Michaelson JS; Bush DM; Calvillo KZ; Kopans DB; Smith BL
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2839-46. PubMed ID: 24018987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is surgical management compromised in elderly patients with breast cancer?
Wanebo HJ; Cole B; Chung M; Vezeridis M; Schepps B; Fulton J; Bland K
Ann Surg; 1997 May; 225(5):579-86; discussion 586-9. PubMed ID: 9193185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Difficult Access and Poor Productivity: Mammography Screening in Brazil.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; Correa RDS; Peixoto JE; Ribeiro NV; Ferreira NC; Soares LR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 31244310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?
Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X;
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.
Lerman C; Daly M; Sands C; Balshem A; Lustbader E; Heggan T; Goldstein L; James J; Engstrom P
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jul; 85(13):1074-80. PubMed ID: 8515494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Mammographic over-screening: evaluation based on probabilistic linkage of records databases from the Breast Cancer Information System (SISMAMA)].
Rodrigues TB; Stavola B; Bustamante-Teixeira MT; Guerra MR; Nogueira MC; Fayer VA; Corrêa CSL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Cad Saude Publica; 2019; 35(1):e00049718. PubMed ID: 30652825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.
Neal CH; Rahman WT; Joe AI; Noroozian M; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):228-234. PubMed ID: 29091007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Annual screening mammography for breast cancer in women 75 years old or older: to screen or not to screen.
Hartman M; Drotman M; Arleo EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1132-6. PubMed ID: 25905953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kardinah D; Anderson BO; Duggan C; Ali IA; Thomas DB
Int J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 134(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 24037942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
