114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22437768)
41. Trends in mammography 1991-96 and the impact of nationwide screening in The Netherlands.
van Leiden HA; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; van der Maas PJ; de Koning HJ
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10444728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
Roman M; Hubbard RA; Sebuodegard S; Miglioretti DL; Castells X; Hofvind S
Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3952-8. PubMed ID: 23963877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer.
Wu H; Zhu K; Jatoi I; Shah M; Shriver CD; Potter J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16821080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
Kwong A; Hancock SL; Bloom JR; Pal S; Birdwell RL; Mariscal C; Ikeda DM
Breast J; 2008; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18186864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.
Chung CS; Giess CS; Gombos EC; Frost EP; Yeh ED; Raza S; Birdwell RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):922-7. PubMed ID: 24660725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast Cancer screening in Minas Gerais: assessment of data from information health systems of the Brazilian National Health System.
Corrêa CSL; Pereira LC; Leite ICG; Fayer VA; Guerra MR; Bustamante-Teixeira MT
Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):481-492. PubMed ID: 28977173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study.
Fletcher SW; Harris RP; Gonzalez JJ; Degnan D; Lannin DR; Strecher VJ; Pilgrim C; Quade D; Earp JA; Clark RL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jan; 85(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 8418300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mammographic surveillance of asymptomatic breast cancer relatives in general practice: rate of re-attendance and GP- and patient-related barriers.
Duijm LE; Guit GL; Zaat JO
Fam Pract; 1997 Dec; 14(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 9476075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
