These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22437962)

  • 1. Event coding and motor priming: how attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties.
    Ocampo B; Painter DR; Kritikos A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 May; 219(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 22437962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent.
    van Elk M; van Schie HT; Bekkering H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):539-47. PubMed ID: 21904930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: hand-centred effects.
    Griffiths D; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2450-70. PubMed ID: 19731190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? A comparison of goal-directed and goal-less actions.
    Chiavarino C; Bugiani S; Grandi E; Colle L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 23422654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor contagion: goal-directed actions are more contagious than non-goal-directed actions.
    Bouquet CA; Shipley TF; Capa RL; Marshall PJ
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 20494864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of 'mu' rhythm modulation to the relevance of an observed movement but not to goal congruency.
    Silas J; Levy JP; Holmes A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22664307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous action execution and observation optimise grasping actions.
    Ménoret M; Curie A; des Portes V; Nazir TA; Paulignan Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 23615976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Movement interference in autism-spectrum disorder.
    Gowen E; Stanley J; Miall RC
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1060-8. PubMed ID: 18096192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactor's body shape does not affect visuo-motor interference effects during motor coordination.
    Gandolfo M; Era V; Tieri G; Sacheli LM; Candidi M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():42-50. PubMed ID: 30986565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual-motor interactions during action observation are shaped by cognitive context.
    Bortoletto M; Baker KS; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 25(11):1794-806. PubMed ID: 23767924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy.
    Liepelt R; Brass M
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 20178950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.
    Kilner JM; Paulignan Y; Blakemore SJ
    Curr Biol; 2003 Mar; 13(6):522-5. PubMed ID: 12646137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation.
    Capa RL; Marshall PJ; Shipley TF; Salesse RN; Bouquet CA
    Psychol Res; 2011 Mar; 75(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 20668875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor priming by movement observation with contralateral concurrent action execution.
    Itaguchi Y; Kaneko F
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():94-102. PubMed ID: 29195131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts.
    Ocampo B; Kritikos A
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 201(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 19937320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incongruent imagery interferes with action initiation.
    Ramsey R; Cumming J; Eastough D; Edwards MG
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 20846772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic priming of grip force following action observation.
    Salama IM; Turner S; Edwards MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 21512959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study.
    Aziz-Zadeh L; Maeda F; Zaidel E; Mazziotta J; Iacoboni M
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 11976767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.