315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22437967)
1. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
Barolet D
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pneumatic skin flattening (PSF): a novel technology for marked pain reduction in hair removal with high energy density lasers and IPLs.
Lask G; Friedman D; Elman M; Fournier N; Shavit R; Slatkine M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2006 Jun; 8(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16766485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hair removal on dark-skinned patients with pneumatic skin flattening (PSF) and a high-energy Nd:YAG laser.
Fournier N
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2008 Dec; 10(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 18830870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
Wheeland RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pain inhibition with pneumatic skin flattening (PSF) in permanent diode laser hair removal.
Ke M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2007 Dec; 9(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 18236242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hair structures are effectively altered during 810 nm diode laser hair epilation at low fluences.
Trelles MA; Urdiales F; Al-Zarouni M
J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Mar; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19585319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hair removal with an 800-nm pulsed diode laser.
Campos VB; Dierickx CC; Farinelli WA; Lin TY; Manuskiatti W; Anderson RR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 43(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 10954655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diode laser hair removal in patients undergoing isotretinoin therapy.
Khatri KA
Dermatol Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1205-7; discussion 1207. PubMed ID: 15355360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days.
Bouzari N; Tabatabai H; Abbasi Z; Firooz A; Dowlati Y
Int J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 44(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 15663662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and safety of a 0.65 millisecond pulsed portable ND:YAG laser for hair removal.
Khatri KA; Lee RA; Goldberg LJ; Khatri B; Garcia V
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19199118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
