These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22438108)
1. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Lemke AA; Halverson C; Ross LF Am J Med Genet A; 2012 May; 158A(5):1029-37. PubMed ID: 22438108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children. Halverson CM; Ross LF J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):561-6. PubMed ID: 22573882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results. Halverson CM; Ross LF J Community Genet; 2012 Oct; 3(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 22454259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. «If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research. Ursin L; Ytterhus B; Christensen E; Skolbekken JA Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Dec; 23(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 32734531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research. Halverson CM; Ross LF Genet Med; 2012 Jun; 14(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 22261760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation. De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey. Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Still Rather Hazy at Present": Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent. Barazzetti G; Cavalli S; Benaroyo L; Kaufmann A Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Mar; 21(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 28177781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community recommendations on biobank governance: Results from a deliberative community engagement in California. Dry SM; Garrett SB; Koenig BA; Brown AF; Burgess MM; Hult JR; Longstaff H; Wilcox ES; Madrigal Contreras SK; Martinez A; Boyd EA; Dohan D PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172582. PubMed ID: 28235046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa. Moodley K; Singh S BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research participant understanding and engagement in an institutional, self-consent biobank model. Schmanski A; Roberts E; Coors M; Wicks SJ; Arbet J; Weber R; Crooks K; Barnes KC; Taylor MRG J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):257-267. PubMed ID: 32951257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer donor preferences for disposition of their biospecimens after biobank closure. Allen SC; Dixon MD; Switchenko JM; Pentz RD Cancer; 2017 Dec; 123(23):4648-4652. PubMed ID: 28746751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources. Nicol D; Critchley C; McWhirter R; Whitton T Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 162():79-87. PubMed ID: 27343817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US. Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linking Broad Consent to Biobank Governance: Support From a Deliberative Public Engagement in California. Garrett SB; Dohan D; Koenig BA Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(9):56-7. PubMed ID: 26305757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Returning Results in Biobank Research: Global Trends and Solutions. De Clercq E; Kaye J; Wolf SM; Koenig BA; Elger BS Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Mar; 21(3):128-131. PubMed ID: 28146646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Secondary Use of Patient Tissue in Cancer Biobanks. Mathews DJH; Rabin JT; Quain K; Campbell E; Collyar D; Hlubocky FJ; Isakoff S; Peppercorn J Oncologist; 2019 Dec; 24(12):1577-1583. PubMed ID: 31182655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research. Ursin L; Stuifbergen M J Med Ethics; 2018 Oct; 44(10):695-699. PubMed ID: 29921618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practice evaluation of biobank ethics and governance: current needs and future perspectives. Langhof H; Schwietering J; Strech D J Med Genet; 2019 Mar; 56(3):176-185. PubMed ID: 30464052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]