These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22438366)

  • 1. Patient acceptability and psychologic consequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients.
    von Wagner C; Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Smith S; Dadswell E; Lilford RJ; Morton D; Atkin W; Wardle J;
    Radiology; 2012 Jun; 263(3):723-31. PubMed ID: 22438366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients.
    von Wagner C; Smith S; Halligan S; Ghanouni A; Power E; Lilford RJ; Morton D; Dadswell E; Atkin W; Wardle J;
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Oct; 21(10):2046-55. PubMed ID: 21626363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Saunders BP; Bassett P; Vance M; Bartram CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 14500202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
    Jung HS; Park DK; Kim MJ; Yu SK; Kwon KA; Ku YS; Kim YK; Kim JH
    Korean J Intern Med; 2009 Mar; 24(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 19270481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
    Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.
    van Gelder RE; Birnie E; Florie J; Schutter MP; Bartelsman JF; Snel P; Laméris JS; Bonsel GJ; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):328-37. PubMed ID: 15358854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.
    Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
    Gut; 2012 Nov; 61(11):1552-9. PubMed ID: 22198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.
    Gluecker TM; Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Offord KP; Harris AM; Wilson LA; Ahlquist DA
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 12732696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.
    Neri E; Giusti P; Battolla L; Vagli P; Boraschi P; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Bartolozzi C
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 12034925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Stoop EM; de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; van Ballegooijen M; Nio CY; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Stoker J; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22088831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient experiences of colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography: a qualitative study.
    Von Wagner C; Knight K; Halligan S; Atkin W; Lilford R; Morton D; Wardle J
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):13-9. PubMed ID: 18824501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and CT Colonography Screening: Patients' Experience with and Factors for Undergoing Screening-Insight from the Proteus Colon Trial.
    Senore C; Correale L; Regge D; Hassan C; Iussich G; Silvani M; Arrigoni A; Morra L; Segnan N
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):873-883. PubMed ID: 29040021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial.
    van Dam L; de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Thomeer M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M; Stoker J; Dekker E; Steyerberg EW
    Endoscopy; 2013; 45(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 23446667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
    Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer.
    Fini L; Laghi L; Hassan C; Pestalozza A; Pagano N; Balzarini L; Repici A; Pickhardt PJ; Malesci A
    Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 24475809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.
    Scott RG; Edwards JT; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Mendelson RM; Forbes GM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1145-51. PubMed ID: 15180739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.
    Atkin W; Dadswell E; Wooldrage K; Kralj-Hans I; von Wagner C; Edwards R; Yao G; Kay C; Burling D; Faiz O; Teare J; Lilford RJ; Morton D; Wardle J; Halligan S;
    Lancet; 2013 Apr; 381(9873):1194-202. PubMed ID: 23414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study.
    Edwards JT; Mendelson RM; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Wood C; Murray D; Forbes GM
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 14688402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.