789 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22438442)
1. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.
Bogner W; Pinker-Domenig K; Bickel H; Chmelik M; Weber M; Helbich TH; Trattnig S; Gruber S
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 22438442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T.
Bogner W; Pinker K; Zaric O; Baltzer P; Minarikova L; Porter D; Bago-Horvath Z; Dubsky P; Helbich TH; Trattnig S; Gruber S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 25341078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study.
Thian YL; Xie W; Porter DA; Weileng Ang B
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 24594423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in rectal cancer: Comparison with single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.
Xia CC; Liu X; Peng WL; Li L; Zhang JG; Meng WJ; Deng XB; Zuo PL; Li ZL
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1818-1823. PubMed ID: 27666622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of single-shot and readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke patients at 3 T.
Morelli J; Porter D; Ai F; Gerdes C; Saettele M; Feiweier T; Padua A; Dix J; Marra M; Rangaswamy R; Runge V
Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 23319722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study.
Kuhl CK; Gieseke J; von Falkenhausen M; Textor J; Gernert S; Sonntag C; Schild HH
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):517-26. PubMed ID: 15671005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of readout segmented echo planar imaging (EPI) and EPI with reduced field-of-VIew diffusion-weighted imaging at 3t in patients with breast cancer.
Park JY; Shin HJ; Shin KC; Sung YS; Choi WJ; Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1679-88. PubMed ID: 25946597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging.
Zhao M; Liu Z; Sha Y; Wang S; Ye X; Pan Y; Wang S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 26541548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
Wu CJ; Wang Q; Zhang J; Wang XN; Liu XS; Zhang YD; Shi HB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 26830616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted mr imaging in breast cancer: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
Kim YJ; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Park CS; Kim HS; Son YH; Porter DA; Song BJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 25053898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of malignant and benign renal lesions using diffusion-weighted MRI with multiple b values.
Erbay G; Koc Z; Karadeli E; Kuzgunbay B; Goren MR; Bal N
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 22334870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance.
Xu X; Wang Y; Hu H; Su G; Liu H; Shi H; Wu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1457-1467. PubMed ID: 28330373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of malignant from benign pheochromocytomas with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance at 3.0 T.
Dong Y; Liu Q
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 22805661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indeterminate orbital masses: restricted diffusion at MR imaging with echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging predicts malignancy.
Sepahdari AR; Aakalu VK; Setabutr P; Shiehmorteza M; Naheedy JH; Mafee MF
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 20656840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
Bogner W; Gruber S; Pinker K; Grabner G; Stadlbauer A; Weber M; Moser E; Helbich TH; Trattnig S
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 19703869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of multi-model high-resolution diffusion-weighted MR imaging in breast lesions: Based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging.
Tang C; Qin Y; Hu Q; Ai T
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110439. PubMed ID: 35863281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-Weighted MRI to Assess Sacroiliitis: Improved Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) Over Conventional Single-Shot EPI.
Zhang H; Huang H; Zhang Y; Tu Z; Xiao Z; Chen J; Cao D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):450-459. PubMed ID: 32903053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute infarction of the brainstem and posterior fossa: comparison of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.
Byeon J; Kim JY; Cho AH
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):765-9. PubMed ID: 26119255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures.
Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Dürr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 23096183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
