These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22438878)

  • 21. Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains.
    Casile A; Faghih RT; Brown EN
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1007675. PubMed ID: 33493162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Partial Granger causality--eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables.
    Guo S; Seth AK; Kendrick KM; Zhou C; Feng J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 18508128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Confounding effects of phase delays on causality estimation.
    Vakorin VA; Mišić B; Krakovska O; Bezgin G; McIntosh AR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53588. PubMed ID: 23349720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic Granger-Geweke causality modeling with application to interictal spike propagation.
    Lin FH; Hara K; Solo V; Vangel M; Belliveau JW; Stufflebeam SM; Hämäläinen MS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1877-86. PubMed ID: 19378280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detectability of Granger causality for subsampled continuous-time neurophysiological processes.
    Barnett L; Seth AK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Jan; 275():93-121. PubMed ID: 27826091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative performance evaluation of data-driven causality measures applied to brain networks.
    Fasoula A; Attal Y; Schwartz D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 215(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 23537932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies.
    Hesse W; Möller E; Arnold M; Schack B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 12648763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying Granger causal relationships between neural power dynamics and variables of interest.
    Winkler I; Haufe S; Porbadnigk AK; Müller KR; Dähne S
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():489-504. PubMed ID: 25554431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bridging the Gap: Dynamic Causal Modeling and Granger Causality Analysis of Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Bajaj S; Adhikari BM; Friston KJ; Dhamala M
    Brain Connect; 2016 Oct; 6(8):652-661. PubMed ID: 27506256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inferring correlations associated to causal interactions in brain signals using autoregressive models.
    López-Madrona VJ; Matias FS; Mirasso CR; Canals S; Pereda E
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17041. PubMed ID: 31745163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Foundational perspectives on causality in large-scale brain networks.
    Mannino M; Bressler SL
    Phys Life Rev; 2015 Dec; 15():107-23. PubMed ID: 26429630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinguishing causal interactions in neural populations.
    Seth AK; Edelman GM
    Neural Comput; 2007 Apr; 19(4):910-33. PubMed ID: 17348767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing families of dynamic causal models.
    Penny WD; Stephan KE; Daunizeau J; Rosa MJ; Friston KJ; Schofield TM; Leff AP
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Mar; 6(3):e1000709. PubMed ID: 20300649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of Interactions between Dynamic Cellular Network Functionalities by Cascaded Layering.
    Prescott TP; Lang M; Papachristodoulou A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004235. PubMed ID: 25933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spike-field Granger causality for hybrid neural data analysis.
    Gong X; Li W; Liang H
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):809-822. PubMed ID: 31242046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Altered connectivity pattern of hubs in default-mode network with Alzheimer's disease: an Granger causality modeling approach.
    Miao X; Wu X; Li R; Chen K; Yao L
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25546. PubMed ID: 22022410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Componential Granger causality, and its application to identifying the source and mechanisms of the top-down biased activation that controls attention to affective vs sensory processing.
    Ge T; Feng J; Grabenhorst F; Rolls ET
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1846-58. PubMed ID: 21888980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Granger-Causality Inference of the Existence of Unobserved Important Components in Network Analysis.
    Elsegai H
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Jul; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 34441134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal Information of Directed Causal Connectivity in Multi-Trial ERP Data using Partial Granger Causality.
    Youssofzadeh V; Prasad G; Naeem M; Wong-Lin K
    Neuroinformatics; 2016 Jan; 14(1):99-120. PubMed ID: 26470866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Network inference in the presence of latent confounders: the role of instantaneous causalities.
    Elsegai H; Shiells H; Thiel M; Schelter B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 245():91-106. PubMed ID: 25707304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.