These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22439655)
1. A short measure of the need for affect. Appel M; Gnambs T; Maio GR J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):418-26. PubMed ID: 22439655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing maladaptive traits in youth: An English-language version of the Dimensional Personality Symptom Itempool. Decuyper M; De Clercq B; Tackett JL Personal Disord; 2015 Jul; 6(3):239-250. PubMed ID: 25799201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cross-national comparison of a shorter version of the person's relating to others questionnaire. Birtchnell J; Hammond S; Horn E; De Jong C; Kalaitzaki A Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 21960317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zuckerman's revised alternative five-factor model: validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire in four French-speaking countries. Rossier J; Hansenne M; Baudin N; Morizot J J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 22339277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale: measurement invariance, stability, and validity in three countries. Schlotz W; Yim IS; Zoccola PM; Jansen L; Schulz P Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):80-94. PubMed ID: 21280954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The facets of identity: personality pathology assessment through the Inventory of Personality Organization. Preti E; Prunas A; De Panfilis C; Marchesi C; Madeddu F; Clarkin JF Personal Disord; 2015 Apr; 6(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 25867838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Verheul R; Andrea H; Berghout CC; Dolan C; Busschbach JJ; van der Kroft PJ; Bateman AW; Fonagy P Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 18315396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spanish Adaptation of the Need for Affect Questionnaire (NAQ and NAQ-S). Horcajo J; Gil R; Sorrel MA Psicothema; 2023 Aug; 35(3):279-289. PubMed ID: 37493151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Clark LA; Watson D Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30896212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Psychopathology Basic Questionnaire: shortened versions item analysis. Aluja A; Blanch À; Blanco E; Martí-Guiu M; Balada F Span J Psychol; 2015 Jan; 17():E102. PubMed ID: 26055856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining Individual Differences in Interpersonal Influence: On the Psychometric Properties of the Generalized Opinion Leadership Scale (GOLS). Batinic B; Appel M; Gnambs T J Psychol; 2016; 150(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 25706916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Brief Self-Description Rating Form (SNAP-BSRF). Kotelnikova Y; Clark LA; Vernon PA; Hayden EP Assessment; 2015 Feb; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24847163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Spanish version of the Wisconsin Personality Disorders Inventory-IV (WISPI-IV): tests of validity and reliability. Smith TL; Klein MH; Alonso C; Salazar-Fraile J; Felipe-Castaño E; Moreno CL; Acosta SR; Rios LI; Martí-Sanjuán V J Pers Disord; 2011 Dec; 25(6):813-33. PubMed ID: 22217227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the General Self-Efficacy Scale a Reliable Measure to be used in Cross-Cultural Studies? Results from Brazil, Germany and Colombia. Damásio BF; Valentini F; Núñes-Rodriguez SI; Kliem S; Koller SH; Hinz A; Brähler E; Finck C; Zenger M Span J Psychol; 2016 May; 19():E29. PubMed ID: 27225231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Validation Study of the Need for Affect Questionnaire-Short Form in Legal Contexts. Cramer RJ; Wevodau AL; Gardner BO; Bryson CN J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 27484839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Chen FF; Hayes A; Carver CS; Laurenceau JP; Zhang Z J Pers; 2012 Feb; 80(1):219-51. PubMed ID: 22092195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age Neutrality of Categorically and Dimensionally Measured DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder Symptoms. Debast I; Rossi G; van Alphen SP; Pauwels E; Claes L; Dierckx E; Peuskens H; Santens E; Schotte CK J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 25833657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the SWAP-200 in a personality-disordered forensic population: is it valid, reliable and useful? Marin-Avellan LE; McGauley G; Campbell C; Fonagy P Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(1):28-45. PubMed ID: 16470497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Lang FR; John D; Lüdtke O; Schupp J; Wagner GG Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):548-67. PubMed ID: 21424189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]