These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243994)

  • 1. Radiation doses due to breast imaging in Manitoba: 1978-1988.
    Huda W; Sourkes AM; Bews JA; Kowaluk R
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):813-6. PubMed ID: 2243994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.
    Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Sanderud A; Hofvind S; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 21335333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of radiation doses in mammography].
    Lee SK; Hwang SK; Lee LN; Lou GC; Wang CA; Hsu WJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Mar; 51(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 8490794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual doses for women undergoing screening mammography examinations in Poland in 2007.
    Fabiszewska E; Jankowska K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 22088977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.
    Young KC; Burch A; Oduko JM
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Mar; 78(927):207-18. PubMed ID: 15730985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study.
    DU X; Wang J; Zhu BL
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 31217060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: effect on breast cancer rates and years of life.
    Mattsson A; Leitz W; Rutqvist LE
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 10638993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic imaging management in Manitoba: 1995-2000.
    MacEwan DW; Dyck DR; Greenberg ID; Levi CS; Lyons EA; McClarty BM; van der Putten WJ
    Radiographics; 1994 Sep; 14(5):1109-18. PubMed ID: 7991817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography.
    Chen B; Wang Y; Sun X; Guo W; Zhao M; Cui G; Hu L; Li P; Ren Y; Feng J; Yu J
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):868-72. PubMed ID: 21397423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.