These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22439958)

  • 1. Breeding replacement gilts for organic pig herds.
    Leenhouwers JI; Ten Napel J; Hanenberg EH; Merks JW
    Animal; 2011 Feb; 5(4):615-21. PubMed ID: 22439958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive performance of purebred landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number.
    Tantasuparuk W; Lundeheim N; Dalin AM; Kunavongkrit A; Einarsson S
    Theriogenology; 2000 Aug; 54(3):481-96. PubMed ID: 11051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
    Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of pig reproduction in a breeding programme.
    Martinat-Botté F; Bariteau F; Badouard B; Terqui M
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1985; 33():211-28. PubMed ID: 3910826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.
    Hoving LL; Soede NM; Graat EA; Feitsma H; Kemp B
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Oct; 122(1-2):82-9. PubMed ID: 20727690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age, body weight and backfat thickness at first observed oestrus in crossbred Landrace x Yorkshire gilts, seasonal variations and their influence on subsequence reproductive performance.
    Tummaruk P; Tantasuparuk W; Techakumphu M; Kunavongkrit A
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2007 May; 99(1-2):167-81. PubMed ID: 16765000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine insemination with a standard AI dose in a sow pool system.
    Peltoniemi OA; Alm K; Andersson M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Jun; 44(3):414-8. PubMed ID: 19000227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits.
    Bloemhof S; van der Waaij EH; Merks JW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3330-7. PubMed ID: 18708608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.
    Ocepek M; Andersen-Ranberg I; Edwards SA; Fredriksen B; Framstad T; Andersen IL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3550-3560. PubMed ID: 27695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between ovulation rate and litter size in purebred Landrace and Yorkshire gilts.
    Tantasuparuk W; Techakumphu M; Dornin S
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):1142-8. PubMed ID: 15710199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with specific health, welfare and reproductive performance indicators in pig herds from five EU countries.
    Chantziaras I; Dewulf J; Van Limbergen T; Klinkenberg M; Palzer A; Pineiro C; Aarestrup Moustsen V; Niemi J; Kyriazakis I; Maes D
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 159():106-114. PubMed ID: 30314772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of polymorphisms in candidate genes on reproduction traits in Finnish pig populations.
    Sironen AI; Uimari P; Serenius T; Mote B; Rothschild M; Vilkki J
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 19933427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for economic comparison of swine insemination programs.
    Lamberson WR; Safranski TJ
    Theriogenology; 2000 Sep; 54(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 11101039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive performance in gilts through their first two parities.
    Linde C; Einarsson S; Pettersson H
    Nord Vet Med; 1984; 36(7-8):207-14. PubMed ID: 6493972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental factors that influence sow longevity.
    Hoge MD; Bates RO
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Apr; 89(4):1238-45. PubMed ID: 21183709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic analysis of age at first service, return rate, litter size, and weaning-to-first service interval of gilts and sows.
    Holm B; Bakken M; Vangen O; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15583041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England.
    Kilbride AL; Mendl M; Statham P; Held S; Harris M; Cooper S; Green LE
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 May; 104(3-4):281-91. PubMed ID: 22197175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.