These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22440095)

  • 41. Genetic comparison of breeding schemes based on semen importation and local breeding schemes: framework and application to Costa Rica.
    Vargas B; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1496-505. PubMed ID: 15290999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Defining desired genetic gains for rainbow trout breeding objective using analytic hierarchy process.
    Sae-Lim P; Komen H; Kause A; van Arendonk JA; Barfoot AJ; Martin KE; Parsons JE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jun; 90(6):1766-76. PubMed ID: 22178851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Traditional livestock breeding practices of men and women Somali pastoralists: trait preferences and selection of breeding animals.
    Marshall K; Mtimet N; Wanyoike F; Ndiwa N; Ghebremariam H; Mugunieri L; Costagli R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Dec; 133(6):534-547. PubMed ID: 27292043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Simulating consequences of choosing a breeding goal for organic dairy production.
    Slagboom M; Wallenbeck A; Hjortø L; Sørensen AC; Rydhmer L; Thomasen JR; Kargo M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11086-11096. PubMed ID: 30316587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measuring farmers' attitude towards breeding tools: the Livestock Breeding Attitude Scale.
    Martin-Collado D; Díaz C; Benito-Ruiz G; Ondé D; Rubio A; Byrne TJ
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100062. PubMed ID: 33712209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Calculating economic weights for sheep sire breeds used in different breeding systems.
    Wolfová M; Wolf J; Milerski M
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1698-711. PubMed ID: 21278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Consequences of selection for yield traits on calving ease performance.
    López de Maturana E; Ugarte E; Komen J; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2497-505. PubMed ID: 17430954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Smallholder cattle farmers' breeding practices and trait preferences in a tropical Guinea savanna agro-ecological zone.
    Yakubu A; Dahloum L; Gimba EG
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2019 Jul; 51(6):1497-1506. PubMed ID: 30762154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Farmers' choice of genotypes and trait preferences in tropically adapted chickens in five agro-ecological zones in Nigeria.
    Yakubu A; Bamidele O; Hassan WA; Ajayi FO; Ogundu UE; Alabi O; Sonaiya EB; Adebambo OA
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Jan; 52(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 31313015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genetic parameters for production traits in New Zealand dual-purpose sheep, with an emphasis on dagginess.
    Pickering NK; Dodds KG; Blair HT; Hickson RE; Johnson PL; McEwan JC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 May; 90(5):1411-20. PubMed ID: 22100586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Possibilities to breed for resistance to nematode parasite infections in small ruminants in tropical production systems.
    Bishop SC
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):741-7. PubMed ID: 22558922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Udder measurements and milk production in two Awassi sheep genotypes and their crosses.
    Iñiguez L; Hilali M; Thomas DL; Jesry G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4613-20. PubMed ID: 19700724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genomics-driven breeding for local adaptation of durum wheat is enhanced by farmers' traditional knowledge.
    Gesesse CA; Nigir B; de Sousa K; Gianfranceschi L; Gallo GR; Poland J; Kidane YG; Abate Desta E; Fadda C; Pè ME; Dell'Acqua M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Apr; 120(14):e2205774119. PubMed ID: 36972461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Participatory definition of trait preferences and breeding practices of goats in Aba'ala, Afar region: as input for designing genetic improvement program.
    Gebre KT; Yfter KA; Teweldemedhn TG; Gebremariam T
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Jan; 52(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 31273581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Determinants of Breeding Farmers' Safe Use of Veterinary Drugs: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.
    Wang J; Yang C; Diao H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30301236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Setting Up Decision-Making Tools toward a Quality-Oriented Participatory Maize Breeding Program.
    Alves ML; Brites C; Paulo M; Carbas B; Belo M; Mendes-Moreira PMR; Brites C; Bronze MDR; Gunjača J; Šatović Z; Vaz Patto MC
    Front Plant Sci; 2017; 8():2203. PubMed ID: 29312428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Defining a breeding objective for Nile tilapia that takes into account the diversity of smallholder production systems.
    Omasaki SK; van Arendonk JA; Kahi AK; Komen H
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):404-13. PubMed ID: 26996153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.