These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2244035)
1. [Evaluation of the role of mammography and echography in breast diseases in a controlled caseload]. Gozzi G; Stacul F; Bassini A; Macorig D; Ukovich W Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 2244035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology. Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group. Lynge E APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Present-day diagnostic techniques in breast nodes]. Sovtsov SA; Mikhaĭlova SA Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(10):42-6. PubMed ID: 9864803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases]. Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management]. Kocjan G Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer]. Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mammography and echography in the study of breast prosthesis]. Panzarola P; Bosso P Radiol Med; 1992 Jun; 83(6):742-4. PubMed ID: 1502352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mammography and echography in the diagnosis of expansive lesions in the dysplastic breast]. Gozzi G; Polonio G; Cressa C; de Morpurgo P Radiol Med; 1984 May; 70(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 6397780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women. Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI. Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mammography and mammary ultrasonography: which examination sequence is preferable?]. Müller-Schimpfle M; Stern W; Stoll P; Kaiser JW; Claussen CD Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9417262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mammographic screening of a random population. Evaluation of 16,500 cases]. Tetti C; Tetti A; Carnieri E Minerva Ginecol; 1991; 43(1-2):39-41. PubMed ID: 1852294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Leddy R; Irshad A; Zerwas E; Mayes N; Armeson K; Abid M; Cluver A; Campbell A; Ackerman S; Lewis M Breast J; 2013; 19(6):582-9. PubMed ID: 24011215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The diagnostic contribution of direct radiographic enlargement and of echography in the study of breast neoplasms]. Cressa C; Gozzi G; Tonutti M; Macorig D; Tessa I Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 8190922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative estimation of the limitations of mammography and echography in senologic practice]. Murat JL; Grumbach Y; Baratte B; Leflot P Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Dec; 79(12):807-19. PubMed ID: 6397831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A-mode echography in surgery. Study of nodular lesions of the breast]. Cannizzaro MA; Rasà G; Nicotra P; Scala V; Turrisi A; Garofolo G; Bianca T Chir Ital; 1979 Oct; 31(5):840-56. PubMed ID: 540382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]