These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22440425)
1. Comparison of cardiac computed tomography examination appropriateness under the 2010 revised versus the 2006 original Appropriate Use Criteria. Wasfy MM; Brady TJ; Abbara S; Nasir K; Hoffmann U; Cury RC; Di Carli MF; Blankstein R J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22440425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of the updated 2010 ACCF Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria. Rich ME; Utsunomiya D; Simprini LA; Weigold WG; Weissman G; Taylor AJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 22440426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriate use criteria for stress echocardiography: impact of updated criteria on appropriateness ratings, correlation with pre-authorization guidelines, and effect of temporal trends and an educational initiative on utilization. Willens HJ; Nelson K; Hendel RC JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 6(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 23433927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing. Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Ishikawa S; Ohki T; Nishi Y; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Higashi T; Fukuda K JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 7(9):1000-9. PubMed ID: 25234672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appropriate utilization of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of stable coronary artery disease. Hammer M; Mian M; Elhadad L; Li M; Roifman I BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Mar; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 33771107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. Hendel RC; Cerqueira M; Douglas PS; Caruth KC; Allen JM; Jensen NC; Pan W; Brindis R; Wolk M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 20117384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography. Ayyad AE; Cole J; Syed A; Desai MY; Halliburton S; Schoenhagen P; Flamm SD; Sola S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 19201372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of coronary CTA Appropriateness Criteria in an academic medical center. Miller JA; Raichlin E; Williamson EE; McCully RB; Pellikka PA; Hodge DO; Miller TD; Gibbons RJ; Araoz PA J Am Coll Radiol; 2010; 7(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20142087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the revised appropriate use criteria for echocardiography represent an improvement over the initial criteria? A comparison between the 2011 and the 2007 appropriateness use criteria for echocardiography. Parikh PB; Asheld J; Kort S; ; J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Feb; 25(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 22014427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the appropriate use criteria for coronary angiography: a cohort study. Mohareb MM; Qiu F; Cantor WJ; Kingsbury KJ; Ko DT; Wijeysundera HC Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 25751586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the applicability of the 2006 and the 2010 cardiac CT angiography appropriate use criteria. Cullen EL; Aggarwal SR; Goss BC; Hodge DO; Gibbons RJ; Araoz PA J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Apr; 10(4):258-67. PubMed ID: 23369549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of coronary revascularization appropriateness for non-acute coronary syndrome cases under the 2017 update vs the 2012 appropriate use criteria. Case BC; Geiser KM; Torguson R; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R; Ben-Dor I Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):620-625. PubMed ID: 30280475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. Carbonaro S; Villines TC; Hausleiter J; Devine PJ; Gerber TC; Taylor AJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 19577209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential indications for cardiac CT. Taylor AJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 22548218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An educational intervention reduces the rate of inappropriate echocardiograms on an inpatient medical service. Bhatia RS; Milford CE; Picard MH; Weiner RB JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 May; 6(5):545-55. PubMed ID: 23582360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability, limitations and downstream impact of echocardiography utilization based on the Appropriateness Use Criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Alqarqaz M; Koneru J; Mahan M; Ananthasubramaniam K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1951-8. PubMed ID: 22231468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Downstream clinical consequences of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance based on appropriate use criteria. McGraw S; Mirza O; Bauml MA; Rangarajan VS; Farzaneh-Far A J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 May; 17(1):35. PubMed ID: 25975961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of professional medical society guidelines for appropriate use of coronary computed tomography angiography. Hu-Wang E; Kureshi F; Leifer ES; Acharya T; Sathya B; Yu JH; Groves DW; Bandettini WP; Shanbhag SM; Chen MY J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(6):478-482. PubMed ID: 32273241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions in Washington State. Bradley SM; Maynard C; Bryson CL Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 22570356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]