These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2244073)

  • 21. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
    Vaikuntam J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.
    Simonsen RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Light-hardened Class I glass-ionomer-resin cement restoration of a permanent molar.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8511261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature.
    Croll TP; Nicholson JW
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12412956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
    Smales RJ; Yip HK
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
    Attar N; Onen A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A restorative dentistry renaissance for children: light-hardened glass ionomer/resin cement.
    Croll TP; Killian CM; Helpin ML
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 8486861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Part 2: clinical aspects.
    Sidhu SK; Watson TF
    Dent Update; 1996; 23(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 8948216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Dentinal adhesives and glass ionomer cements: which are the best?].
    Prati C; Montanari G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1989 Oct; 38(10):1065-9. PubMed ID: 2615731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique.
    Smales RJ; Gao W; Ho FT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Practical considerations concerning glass ionomer cements used for basing amalgam restorations.
    O'Hara JW; McManus DB
    Compendium; 1990 Mar; 11(3):130, 132, 134-6. PubMed ID: 2376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.