These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22441181)

  • 21. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
    Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
    Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
    Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements.
    Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
    Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000.
    Tasker F; De Greeff A; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Sep; 24(9):609-16. PubMed ID: 20107491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Cervantes-Munguía R; de Alba-García JG; Parra-Carrillo JZ; López-Maldonado F; Montes-Casillas M
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 17890971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of the BP A100 blood pressure measuring device coupled with a single cuff with standard-size bladder over a wide range of arm circumferences.
    Bonso E; Dorigatti F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 19734782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Tzamouranis DG
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18199922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of three office blood pressure measurement techniques and their effect on hypertension prevalence in the general population.
    Wohlfahrt P; Cífková R; Krajčoviechová A; Šulc P; Bruthans J; Linhart A; Filipovský J; Mayer O; Widimský J
    J Hypertens; 2020 Apr; 38(4):656-662. PubMed ID: 31834128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory method for ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
    Wiinberg N; Raymond IE; Bang LE; Malmqvist BB; Svendsen TL; Petersen LJ
    Blood Press Monit; 1996 Jun; 1(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 10226224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.