115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22441432)
1. An ounce of breast cancer prevention--let's try for a pound.
Warner E
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 May; 21(5):705-6. PubMed ID: 22441432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. StatBite: Percent change in DCIS, invasive breast cancer, and mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Mar; 103(6):457. PubMed ID: 21393608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
Kopans DB
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):487; author reply 487-8. PubMed ID: 12644544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Overdiagnosis in mammography screening: a 45 year journey from shadowy idea to acknowledged reality.
Barratt A
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h867. PubMed ID: 25736426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for early breast cancer reduces invasive cancer, study finds.
Mayor S
BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6576. PubMed ID: 26643040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DCIS and invasive interval breast cancer.
Foucar E
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Mar; 17(3):e87. PubMed ID: 26972860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DCIS and invasive interval breast cancer.
Narod SA; Sopik V; Sun P
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Mar; 17(3):e87-e88. PubMed ID: 26972859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ductal carcinoma in situ].
Roisman I; Lifshitz I; Bitterman A; Cohen O
Harefuah; 2004 Mar; 143(3):227-31, 244. PubMed ID: 15065365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DCIS and invasive interval breast cancer - Author's reply.
Duffy SW
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Mar; 17(3):e88-e89. PubMed ID: 26972861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent interval cancers.
Shieh Y; Eklund M; Esserman L
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i551. PubMed ID: 26834245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of DCIS and reduced invasive interval cancers.
Evans A
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 26655426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound. The clinical context.
Wilson AR
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11 Suppl 3():E35-40. PubMed ID: 11793051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-simultaneous bilateral breast carcinoma.
Watanatittan S; Ram MD
Surgery; 1974 May; 75(5):740-5. PubMed ID: 4363178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [To the Editors: Comment on the study by Kullmann and Misset "Benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening"].
Kovács A; Budai A; Döbrössy L; Péntek Z; Ormándi K; Forrai G
Orv Hetil; 2010 Dec; 151(49):2031-2, discussion 2033-4.. PubMed ID: 21106484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing attendees with non-attendees in breast screening does not provide useful information about an effect on prognostic features or mortality.
Jørgensen KJ; Kalager M; Zahl PH; Fønnebø VM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Nov; 136(2):617-8, author reply 619-20. PubMed ID: 23011508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast screening saves lives: now is the time to address overtreatment.
Rea D; Francis A
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 24645681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Projecting the benefits and harms of mammography using statistical models: proof or proofiness?
Kramer BS; Elmore JG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25925581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why is microcalcification missed on mammography?
Peters G; Jones CM; Daniels K
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 23374551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mammography in breast cancer].
Zal'tsman IN
Med Radiol (Mosk); 1972 Jul; 17(7):23-8. PubMed ID: 4351234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic importance of the radiographic density of noncalcified breast masses: analysis of 91 lesions.
Jackson VP; Dines KA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Reynolds HE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1646563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
