201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22441643)
1. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.
Burger EA; Ortendahl JD; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
Br J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 106(9):1571-8. PubMed ID: 22441643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination.
Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Stout NK; Salomon JA; Kuntz KM; Goldie SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):308-20. PubMed ID: 18314477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Present and future of cervical cancer prevention in Spain: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Georgalis L; de Sanjosé S; Esnaola M; Bosch FX; Diaz M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Sep; 25(5):430-9. PubMed ID: 26375246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing wisely: a model-based analysis evaluating the trade-offs in cancer benefit and diagnostic referrals among alternative HPV testing strategies in Norway.
Burger EA; Pedersen K; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
Br J Cancer; 2017 Sep; 117(6):783-790. PubMed ID: 28772279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines.
Pedersen K; Burger EA; Nygård M; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Mar; 91():68-75. PubMed ID: 29335156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.
Choi HCW; Leung K; Chan KKL; Bai Y; Jit M; Wu JT
BMC Med; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36765349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Berkhof J; Bogaards JA; Demirel E; Diaz M; Sharma M; Kim JJ
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 7():H71-9. PubMed ID: 24332299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus triage approaches among vaccinated women in Norway: A model-based analysis.
Portnoy A; Pedersen K; Sy S; Tropé A; Engesaeter B; Kim JJ; Burger EA
Int J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 154(6):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 38088449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary HPV testing for unvaccinated women in Sweden.
Fogelberg S; Clements MS; Pedersen K; Sy S; Sparén P; Kim JJ; Burger EA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239611. PubMed ID: 32997696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Switching clinic-based cervical cancer screening programs to human papillomavirus self-sampling: A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccinated and unvaccinated Norwegian women.
Pedersen K; Portnoy A; Sy S; Hansen BT; Tropé A; Kim JJ; Burger EA
Int J Cancer; 2022 Feb; 150(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 34664271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.
Berkhof J; Coupé VM; Bogaards JA; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 127(9):2147-58. PubMed ID: 20112339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 15956650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in women older than 30 years in the United States.
Kim JJ; Ortendahl J; Goldie SJ
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Oct; 151(8):538-45. PubMed ID: 19841455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing to augment cervical cancer screening in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
Goldie SJ; Freedberg KA; Weinstein MC; Wright TC; Kuntz KM
Am J Med; 2001 Aug; 111(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11498068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening program based on primary DNA-HPV testing in a Brazilian city: a cost-effectiveness study protocol.
Teixeira JC; Vale DB; Bragança JF; Campos CS; Discacciati MG; Zeferino LC
BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):576. PubMed ID: 32345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
