These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22442193)
1. Is the general time-reversible model bad for molecular phylogenetics? Sumner JG; Jarvis PD; Fernández-Sánchez J; Kaine BT; Woodhams MD; Holland BR Syst Biol; 2012 Dec; 61(6):1069-74. PubMed ID: 22442193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A call for likelihood phylogenetics even when the process of sequence evolution is heterogeneous. Gaucher EA; Miyamoto MM Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Dec; 37(3):928-31. PubMed ID: 16291095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Matrix representations with parsimony or with distances: two sides of the same coin? Lapointe FJ; Wilkinson M; Bryant D Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):865-8. PubMed ID: 14668125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Model parameterization, prior distributions, and the general time-reversible model in Bayesian phylogenetics. Zwickl D; Holder M Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):877-88. PubMed ID: 15764557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supertrees join the mainstream of phylogenetics. Cotton JA; Wilkinson M Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19022523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving divergence time estimation in phylogenetics: more taxa vs. longer sequences. Svennblad B; Britton T Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article35. PubMed ID: 18171319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why non-uniform priors on clades are both unavoidable and unobjectionable. Velasco JD Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Nov; 45(2):748-9. PubMed ID: 17904391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Choosing the best genes for the job: the case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. Collins TM; Fedrigo O; Naylor GJ Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 16012114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Popperian corroboration and phylogenetics. de Queiroz K Syst Biol; 2014 Nov; 63(6):1018-22. PubMed ID: 25151624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating stagnation in morphological phylogenetics using consensus data. Harris SR; Pisani D; Gower DJ; Wilkinson M Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 17366142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics]. Pavlinov IIa Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphometrics and phylogenetics: principal components of shape from cranial modules are neither appropriate nor effective cladistic characters. Adams DC; Cardini A; Monteiro LR; O'Higgins P; Rohlf FJ J Hum Evol; 2011 Feb; 60(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 20303142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics. Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Kubatko LS; Degnan JH Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 17366134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heritability of extinction rates links diversification patterns in molecular phylogenies and fossils. Rabosky DL Syst Biol; 2009 Dec; 58(6):629-40. PubMed ID: 20525614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular phylogenetics of the butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae): taxonomy and biogeography of a global coral reef fish family. Fessler JL; Westneat MW Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Oct; 45(1):50-68. PubMed ID: 17625921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paraphyly-again!? A plea against the dissociation of taxonomy and phylogenetics. Zachos FE Zootaxa; 2014 Feb; 3764():594-6. PubMed ID: 24870659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Phylogenetic diversity and the greedy algorithm. Steel M Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):527-9. PubMed ID: 16051588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]