These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2244276)

  • 1. Biopsy of the breast for mammographically detected lesions.
    Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Dec; 171(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 2244276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open breast biopsy. A critical analysis.
    Shroff JH; Lloyd LR; Schroder DM
    Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):481-5. PubMed ID: 1928989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study.
    Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM
    Arch Surg; 1990 Feb; 125(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 2154171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of the results of mammographically guided biopsies of the breast.
    McCreery BR; Frankl G; Frost DB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 172(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1847244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer in nonpalpable lesions: can mammographic parenchymal pattern improve the predictive value of biopsy?
    Weaver M
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):692-4. PubMed ID: 1485702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective study of double diagnosis of nonpalpable lesions of the breast.
    Dowlatshahi K; Jokich PM; Kluskens LF; Patel R; Economou SG
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Feb; 172(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1846452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography.
    Hall FM; Storella JM; Silverstone DZ; Wyshak G
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 3282256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
    Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multivariate analysis of roentgenologic characteristics and risk factors for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast.
    Harkins K; Tartter PI; Hermann G; Squitieri R; Brower ST; Keller RJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 8173725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic wire localization in diagnosis and treatment of occult carcinoma of breast.
    Petrovich JA; Ross DS; Sullivan JW; Lake TP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 2537536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic value of clustered microcalcifications discovered by mammography (apropos of 227 cases with histological verification and without a palpable breast tumor)].
    Le Gal M; Chavanne G; Pellier D
    Bull Cancer; 1984; 71(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 6713115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable, mammographically detected lesions.
    Bassett LW; Liu TH; Giuliano AE; Gold RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 1646562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pathology of nonpalpable breast cancer.
    Kopald KH; Hiatt JR; Irving C; Giuliano AE
    Am Surg; 1990 Dec; 56(12):782-7. PubMed ID: 2268107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of mammographic indeterminate lesions. First place winner of the Conrad Jobst Award in the Gold Medal paper competition.
    Hamby LS; McGrath PC; Stelling CB; Baker KF; Sloan DA; Kenady DE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD; Rutter CM; Eby PR; White E; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.