These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible. Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface alterations of polished and sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants after Er:YAG, carbon dioxide, and diode laser irradiation. Stubinger S; Etter C; Miskiewicz M; Homann F; Saldamli B; Wieland M; Sader R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 20209192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits. Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants. Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces. Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphologic and bone-to-implant contact evaluation of dual acid-etched and bioceramic grit-blasted implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Fernandes CA; Gil JN; Coelho PG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1877-83. PubMed ID: 20542367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography. Perrotti V; Aprile G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Iezzi G Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]