433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22442769)
21. Analysis of the attachment and differentiation of three-dimensional rotary wall vessel cultured human preosteoblasts on dental implant surfaces.
Ko YJ; Zaharias RS; Seabold DA; Lafoon JE; Schneider GB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):722-8. PubMed ID: 20657867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces.
Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Novel application of cytodetachment technology to the analysis of dental implant surfaces.
Bhatavadekar NB; Hu J; Keys K; Ofek G; Athanasiou KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):985-90. PubMed ID: 22010080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of an erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser on the reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium implant surfaces.
Schwarz F; Nuesry E; Bieling K; Herten M; Becker J
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1820-7. PubMed ID: 17076606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study.
Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces.
Sela MN; Badihi L; Rosen G; Steinberg D; Kohavi D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 17484735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures.
Matarasso S; Quaremba G; Coraggio F; Vaia E; Cafiero C; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9002824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implant surface roughness alterations induced by different prophylactic procedures: an in vitro study.
Cafiero C; Aglietta M; Iorio-Siciliano V; Salvi GE; Blasi A; Matarasso S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e16-e20. PubMed ID: 27283010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK.
Schmidlin PR; Stawarczyk B; Wieland M; Attin T; Hämmerle CH; Fischer J
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 20206986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution.
Stadlinger B; Ferguson SJ; Eckelt U; Mai R; Lode AT; Loukota R; Schlottig F
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21177005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion.
Al-Radha AS; Dymock D; Younes C; O'Sullivan D
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22182466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of Surface Conditions of Titanium Dental Implants on Bacterial Adhesion.
Chen CJ; Ding SJ; Chen CC
Photomed Laser Surg; 2016 Sep; 34(9):379-88. PubMed ID: 27454339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Neural response to sandblasted/acid-etched, TiO-blasted, polished, and mechanochemically polished/nanostructured titanium implant surfaces.
Onur MA; Sezgin A; Gürpinar A; Sommer A; Akça K; Cehreli M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 16958694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
