These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22442773)

  • 1. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions.
    Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of heat transfer to the implant-bone interface related to exothermic heat generation during setting of autopolymerizing acrylic resins applied directly to an implant abutment.
    Ormianer Z; Laufer BZ; Nissan J; Gross M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 11151583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part II: comparison of four acrylic resins.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 22208886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations.
    Assunção WG; Britto RC; Ricardo Barão VA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 20386220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part I: comparison of three direct methods.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 22066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.