These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22442930)

  • 21. Evaluation of potential for mercury volatilization from natural and FGD gypsum products using flux-chamber tests.
    Shock SS; Noggle JJ; Bloom N; Yost LJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2282-7. PubMed ID: 19452875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of wet flue gas desulfurization scrubbing on mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations.
    Niksa S; Fujiwara N
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jul; 55(7):970-7. PubMed ID: 16111136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion.
    Otero-Rey JR; López-Vilariño JM; Moreda-Piñeiro J; Alonso-Rodríguez E; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; López-Mahía P; Prada-Rodríguez D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5262-7. PubMed ID: 14655716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hg2+ reduction and re-emission from simulated wet flue gas desulfurization liquors.
    Wo J; Zhang M; Cheng X; Zhong X; Xu J; Xu X
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(2-3):1106-10. PubMed ID: 19699584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Major element, trace element, nutrient, and radionuclide mobility in a mining by-product-amended soil.
    Douglas G; Adeney J; Johnston K; Wendling L; Coleman S
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(6):1818-34. PubMed ID: 23128739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Air-substrate mercury exchange associated with landfill disposal of coal combustion products.
    Xin M; Gustin MS; Ladwig K; Pflughoeft-Hassett DF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Aug; 56(8):1167-76. PubMed ID: 16933649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mercury accumulation in grass and forb species as a function of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and mercury exposures in air and soil.
    Millhollen AG; Obrist D; Gustin MS
    Chemosphere; 2006 Oct; 65(5):889-97. PubMed ID: 16631233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing Water-Soluble Phosphorus in Soil through Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum Application: Year of Application Effects at Multiple Sites in Wisconsin.
    Sindelar ME; Wolkowski RP
    J Environ Qual; 2019 May; 48(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 31180427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mercury mass balances: a case study of two North Dakota power plants.
    Laudal DL; Pavlish JH; Graves J; Stockdill D
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1798-804. PubMed ID: 11288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Production and resource utilization of flue gas desulfurized gypsum in China - A review.
    Liu S; Liu W; Jiao F; Qin W; Yang C
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Nov; 288():117799. PubMed ID: 34329050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA.
    Gray JE; Theodorakos PM; Fey DL; Krabbenhoft DP
    Environ Geochem Health; 2015 Feb; 37(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 24974151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber.
    Chang JC; Ghorishi SB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(24):5763-6. PubMed ID: 14717192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mercury vapor pressure of flue gas desulfurization scrubber suspensions: effects of pH level, gypsum, and iron.
    Schuetze J; Kunth D; Weissbach S; Koeser H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3008-13. PubMed ID: 22324514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of additives on Hg2+ reduction and precipitation inhibited by sodium dithiocarbamate in simulated flue gas desulfurization solutions.
    Lu R; Hou J; Xu J; Tang T; Xu X
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Nov; 196():160-5. PubMed ID: 21955657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of flue gas desulfurization gypsum application on water quality in a coastal plain soil.
    Torbert HA; Watts DB
    J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 25602560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite derived from flue gas desulphurization gypsum on simultaneous immobilization of lead and cadmium in contaminated soil.
    Yan Y; Li Q; Yang J; Zhou S; Wang L; Bolan N
    J Hazard Mater; 2020 Dec; 400():123038. PubMed ID: 32947730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mercury removals by existing pollutants control devices of four coal-fired power plants in China.
    Wang J; Wang W; Xu W; Wang X; Zhao S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(11):1839-44. PubMed ID: 22432308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In-season effect of flue gas desulfurization gypsum on soil physical properties.
    Buckley ME; Wolkowski RP
    J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):322-7. PubMed ID: 25602566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of flue gas desulfurization and mined gypsums on soil properties and on hay and corn growth in eastern ohio.
    Kost D; Chen L; Guo X; Tian Y; Ladwig K; Dick WA
    J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):312-21. PubMed ID: 25602565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms.
    Stamenkovic J; Gustin MS; Arnone JA; Johnson DW; Larsen JD; Verburg PS
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 406(1-2):227-38. PubMed ID: 18775555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.