These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22443522)

  • 1. Study of compliance with a new, targeted antenatal D immunization prevention programme in Denmark.
    Damkjaer MB; Perslev A; Clausen FB; Dziegiel MH; Jørgensen FS
    Vox Sang; 2012 Aug; 103(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 22443522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Report of the first nationally implemented clinical routine screening for fetal RHD in D- pregnant women to ascertain the requirement for antenatal RhD prophylaxis.
    Clausen FB; Christiansen M; Steffensen R; Jørgensen S; Nielsen C; Jakobsen MA; Madsen RD; Jensen K; Krog GR; Rieneck K; Sprogøe U; Homburg KM; Grunnet N; Dziegiel MH
    Transfusion; 2012 Apr; 52(4):752-8. PubMed ID: 21995641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Lloyd Jones M; Wight J; Forman K; Wray J; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 15327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs and benefits of non-invasive fetal RhD determination.
    Teitelbaum L; Metcalfe A; Clarke G; Parboosingh JS; Wilson RD; Johnson JM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 25380024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis program for RhD-negative pregnant women - outcome of the first two years of a national program in Finland.
    Haimila K; Sulin K; Kuosmanen M; Sareneva I; Korhonen A; Natunen S; Tuimala J; Sainio S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1228-1233. PubMed ID: 28718198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD immunisation--outcome of a new antenatal screening and prevention program.
    Tiblad E; Taune Wikman A; Ajne G; Blanck A; Jansson Y; Karlsson A; Nordlander E; Holländer BS; Westgren M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e70984. PubMed ID: 23940682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of being Rhesus D immunized during pregnancy and how to optimize new prevention strategies.
    Tiblad E; Westgren M; Pasupathy D; Karlsson A; Wikman AT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1079-85. PubMed ID: 23750781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen.
    Chaffe B; Ford J; Bills V
    Transfus Med; 2007 Oct; 17(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 17903141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis.
    Koelewijn JM; de Haas M; Vrijkotte TG; van der Schoot CE; Bonsel GJ
    BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1307-14. PubMed ID: 19538414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compliance with routine antenatal rhesus D prophylaxis and the impact on sensitisations: observations over 14 years.
    MacKenzie IZ; Findlay J; Thompson K; Roseman F
    BJOG; 2006 Jul; 113(7):839-43. PubMed ID: 16827770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery.
    Sørensen K; Stjern HE; Karlsen BAG; Tomter G; Ystad I; Herud I; Baevre MS; Llohn AH; Akkök ÇA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 35224728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus-negative women who are pregnant.
    Jones ML; Wray J; Wight J; Chilcott J; Forman K; Tappenden P; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):892-902. PubMed ID: 15327601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in RhD-negative pregnant women: a model-based analysis.
    Neovius M; Tiblad E; Westgren M; Kublickas M; Neovius K; Wikman A
    BJOG; 2016 Jul; 123(8):1337-46. PubMed ID: 26663771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. Practical aspects].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S123-1S130. PubMed ID: 16495838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs and clinical outcomes of noninvasive fetal RhD typing for targeted prophylaxis.
    Hawk AF; Chang EY; Shields SM; Simpson KN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 122(3):579-85. PubMed ID: 23921866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients.
    Ben-David G; Sheiner E; Levy A; Erez O; Mazor M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 18330822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit of the investigation and use of anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Tayside.
    Rennie I; Smith A; Smith R; Rawlinson PS; Clark P
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 May; 59(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 12664753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Guideline for prevention of RhD alloimmunizationin RhD negative women].
    Lubušký M; Procházka M; Simetka O; Holusková I
    Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Apr; 78(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 23710977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hemolytic disease of the newborn has not vanished from Finland--routine protection of RhD negative mothers during pregnancy is justifiable].
    Sainio S; Kuosmanen M
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 22372070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Foetal Rhesus-D typing added to antenatal screening for infectious diseases and erythrocyte immunisation].
    van der Ploeg CP; Hirschberg HJ; de Haas M; Abbink F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8315. PubMed ID: 25898866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.