These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22444651)

  • 1. Genetic parameters for bone strength, osteochondrosis and meat percentage in Finnish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Storskrubb A; Sevón-Aimonen ML; Uimari P
    Animal; 2010 Aug; 4(8):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22444651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heritabilities of osteochondral lesions and genetic correlations with production and exterior traits in station-tested pigs.
    Luther H; Schwörer D; Hofer A
    Animal; 2007 Sep; 1(8):1105-11. PubMed ID: 22444855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs.
    Kadarmideen HN; Schwörer D; Ilahi H; Malek M; Hofer A
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3118-27. PubMed ID: 15542457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic parameters of meat quality traits in two pig breeds measured by rapid methods.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Aass L; Odegård J; Vangen O
    Animal; 2010 Nov; 4(11):1832-43. PubMed ID: 22445144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams.
    Greeff JC; Safari E; Fogarty NM; Hopkins DL; Brien FD; Atkins KD; Mortimer SI; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Jun; 125(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 18479272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental changes of carcass composition, meat quality and organs in the Jinhua pig and Landrace.
    Miao ZG; Wang LJ; Xu ZR; Huang JF; Wang YR
    Animal; 2009 Mar; 3(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 22444318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osteochondrosis in six breeds of slaughter pigs. I. A morphological investigation of the status of osteochondrosis in relation to breed and level of feeding.
    Goedegebuure SA; Häni HJ; van der Valk PC; van der Wal PG
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1980 Jan; 105(2):28-41. PubMed ID: 7352332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlative responses for carcass and meat quality traits to selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Péry C; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):903-11. PubMed ID: 19966169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extent of linkage disequilibrium and effective population size in Finnish Landrace and Finnish Yorkshire pig breeds.
    Uimari P; Tapio M
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):609-14. PubMed ID: 21036932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of breed and halothane sensitivity on pig meat quality.
    Oliver MA; Gispert M; Diestre A
    Meat Sci; 1993; 35(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 22060840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Gruand J; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Guillouet P; Lagant H; Noblet J; Sellier P
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: phenotypic, environmental, and genetic correlations with growth, carcass, and longissimus muscle palatability traits.
    Snowder GD; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Bennett GL; Koohmaraie M; Dikeman ME
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Aug; 85(8):1885-92. PubMed ID: 17504959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters of fat quality in pigs measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Aass L; Ødegård J; Kongsro J; Vangen O
    Animal; 2011 Aug; 5(10):1495-505. PubMed ID: 22440339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenotypic measurements and various indices of lean and fat tissue development in barrows and gilts of two genetic lines from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.
    Wiseman TG; Mahan DC; Moeller SJ; Peters JC; Fastinger ND; Ching S; Kim YY
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1816-24. PubMed ID: 17400970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic relationships between composition of pork bellies and performance, carcase and meat quality traits.
    Hermesch S
    Animal; 2008 Aug; 2(8):1178-85. PubMed ID: 22443730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carcass composition and meat quality of indigenous Yanan pigs of China.
    Jiang YZ; Zhu L; Li FQ; Li XW
    Genet Mol Res; 2012 Jan; 11(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 22370883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Chinese breeds on pork quality of commercial pig lines.
    Cesar AS; Silveira AC; Freitas PF; Guimarães EC; Batista DF; Torido LC; Meirelles FV; Antunes RC
    Genet Mol Res; 2010 Apr; 9(2):727-33. PubMed ID: 20449804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of increasing lysine on carcass composition and cutting yields of immunologically castrated male pigs.
    Boler DD; Kutzler LW; Meeuwse DM; King VL; Campion DR; McKeith FK; Killefer J
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2189-99. PubMed ID: 21383034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteochondrosis in pigs diagnosed with computed tomography: heritabilities and genetic correlations to weight gain in specific age intervals.
    Aasmundstad T; Kongsro J; Wetten M; Dolvik NI; Vangen O
    Animal; 2013 Oct; 7(10):1576-82. PubMed ID: 23806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the histochemical characteristics and meat quality traits of different pig breeds.
    Ryu YC; Choi YM; Lee SH; Shin HG; Choe JH; Kim JM; Hong KC; Kim BC
    Meat Sci; 2008 Oct; 80(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 22063341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.