124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22444881)
1. An approach to derive economic weights in breeding objectives using partial profile choice experiments.
Nielsen HM; Amer PR
Animal; 2007 Oct; 1(9):1254-62. PubMed ID: 22444881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of smallholder farmers and pastoralists' preferences for sheep breeding traits: choice model approach.
Duguma G; Mirkena T; Haile A; Okeyo AM; Tibbo M; Rischkowsky B; Sölkner J; Wurzinger M
Animal; 2011 Dec; 5(12):1984-92. PubMed ID: 22440475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A preference-based approach to deriving breeding objectives: applied to sheep breeding.
Byrne TJ; Amer PR; Fennessy PF; Hansen P; Wickham BW
Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):778-88. PubMed ID: 22558925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services.
Wellman GS; Vidican C
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Sep; 4(3):218-30. PubMed ID: 18794033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient and parent preferences for immunoglobulin treatments: a conjoint analysis.
Mohamed AF; Kilambi V; Luo MP; Iyer RG; Li-McLeod JM
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1183-91. PubMed ID: 22846048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring the loss of consumer choice in mandatory health programmes using discrete choice experiments.
Parkinson B; Goodall S; Norman R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 23494935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining desired genetic gains for rainbow trout breeding objective using analytic hierarchy process.
Sae-Lim P; Komen H; Kause A; van Arendonk JA; Barfoot AJ; Martin KE; Parsons JE
J Anim Sci; 2012 Jun; 90(6):1766-76. PubMed ID: 22178851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should I stay or should I go home? A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment on hospital-at-home.
Goossens LM; Utens CM; Smeenk FW; Donkers B; van Schayck OC; Rutten-van Mölken MP
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):588-96. PubMed ID: 25128052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient preference for latent tuberculosis infection preventive treatment: a discrete choice experiment.
Guo N; Marra CA; FitzGerald JM; Elwood RK; Anis AH; Marra F
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):937-43. PubMed ID: 21914516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
König S; Simianer H; Willam A
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection for profit in cattle: I. Economic weights for purebred dairy cattle in the Czech Republic.
Wolfová M; Wolf J; Kvapilík J; Kica J
J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2442-55. PubMed ID: 17430949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of the breeding goal for Norwegian Red dairy cattle.
Steine G; Kristofersson D; Guttormsen AG
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jan; 91(1):418-26. PubMed ID: 18096966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selection for profit in cattle: II. Economic weights for dairy and beef sires in crossbreeding systems.
Wolfová M; Wolf J; Kvapilík J; Kica J
J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2456-67. PubMed ID: 17430950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of carcass price fluctuations on genetic and economic evaluation of carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
Ibi T; Kahi AK; Hirooka H
J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3204-11. PubMed ID: 17093212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using choice experiments to understand household tradeoffs regarding pineapple production and environmental management in Costa Rica.
Richardson RB; Kellon D; Leon RG; Arvai J
J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():308-16. PubMed ID: 23807434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breeding value accuracy estimates for growth traits using random regression and multi-trait models in Nelore cattle.
Boligon AA; Baldi F; Mercadante ME; Lobo RB; Pereira RJ; Albuquerque LG
Genet Mol Res; 2011 Jun; 10(2):1227-36. PubMed ID: 21732287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
