537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22445138)
1. Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.
Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Manoharan M; Jorda M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22445138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pathological outcomes of active surveillance candidates who underwent radical prostatectomy using contemporary protocols at a high-volume Korean center.
Lee DH; Jung HB; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1079-85. PubMed ID: 22988037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percentage of cancer involvement in positive cores can predict unfavorable disease in men with low-risk prostate cancer but eligible for the prostate cancer international: active surveillance criteria.
Russo GI; Cimino S; Castelli T; Favilla V; Urzì D; Veroux M; Madonia M; Morgia G
Urol Oncol; 2014 Apr; 32(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24184119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia on prostate biopsy does not adversely affect prostatectomy outcomes for patients otherwise eligible for active surveillance.
Pietzak EJ; Kabarriti AE; Mucksavage P; Bavaria T; Van Arsdalen K; Malkowicz SB; Wein AJ; Guzzo TJ
Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1442-7. PubMed ID: 25288572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort.
Seiler D; Randazzo M; Klotz L; Grobholz R; Baumgartner M; Isbarn H; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22093744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study.
Bul M; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Staerman F; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22342775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The number of cores taken in patients diagnosed with a single microfocus at initial biopsy is a major predictor of insignificant prostate cancer.
Villa L; Capitanio U; Briganti A; Abdollah F; Suardi N; Salonia A; Gallina A; Freschi M; Russo A; Castiglione F; Bianchi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Scattoni V
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):854-9. PubMed ID: 23022004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study.
Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Soulié M; Pfister C; Van Agt S; Vincendeau S; Larue S; Rigaud J; Gaschignard N; Rouprêt M; Drouin S; Peyromaure M; Long JA; Iborra F; Vallancien G; Rozet F; Salomon L;
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 22770616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The risk of upstaged disease increases with body mass index in low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Bayoud Y; Durand X; Terry S; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 21803484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance--does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria?
Ploussard G; Salomon L; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 20006888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme.
Ploussard G; Xylinas E; Durand X; Ouzaïd I; Allory Y; Bouanane M; Abbou CC; Salomon L; de la Taille A
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 21176083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive report on prostate cancer misclassification by 16 currently used low-risk and active surveillance criteria.
Palisaar JR; Noldus J; Löppenberg B; von Bodman C; Sommerer F; Eggert T
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6 Pt B):E172-81. PubMed ID: 22314081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient selection and pathological outcomes using currently available active surveillance criteria.
El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 23746382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
