These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22446907)

  • 21. [A simple and rapid method for photographic documentation of findings using the slit lamp].
    Wassill KH; Dick B
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Jun; 91(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 8086761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.
    Becker DG; Tardy ME
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11816129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Standardized photography for skin surface.
    Khavkin J; Ellis DA
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 19(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 21763985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feasibility and quality of nonmydriatic fundus photography in children.
    Toffoli D; Bruce BB; Lamirel C; Henderson AD; Newman NJ; Biousse V
    J AAPOS; 2011 Dec; 15(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 22153402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technology and Technique Standards for Camera-Acquired Digital Dermatologic Images: A Systematic Review.
    Quigley EA; Tokay BA; Jewell ST; Marchetti MA; Halpern AC
    JAMA Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 151(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 25970844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery.
    Henderson JL; Larrabee WF; Krieger BD
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2005; 7(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 16172344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding the use of digital photographs in the examination of the dead and living among doctors practicing forensic medicine in Sri Lanka.
    Edirisinghe PAS; Kitulwatte IDG; Nadeera DR
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Jul; 73():101995. PubMed ID: 32658753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing smartphone camera adapters in imaging post-operative cataract patients.
    Sanguansak T; Morley K; Morley M; Kusakul S; Lee R; Shieh E; Yospaiboon Y; Bhoomibunchoo C; Chai-Ear S; Joseph A; Agarwal I
    J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Jan; 23(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 26851243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical photography: a guide for the clinician.
    Nayler JR
    J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 14597792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery--Part II: Additional picture sets and avoiding common mistakes.
    Schaaf H; Streckbein P; Ettorre G; Lowry JC; Mommaerts MY; Howaldt HP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 34(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 17165197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Principles of photography in rhinoplasty for the digital photographer.
    Swamy RS; Sykes JM; Most SP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 20206739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standardizing digital photography: it's not all in the eye of the beholder.
    Galdino GM; Vogel JE; Vander Kolk CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Oct; 108(5):1334-44. PubMed ID: 11604641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical photography and patient rights: the need for orthopraxy.
    Berle I
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Feb; 34(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 18234945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery--part II: additional picture sets and avoiding common mistakes.
    Schaaf H; Streckbein P; Ettorre G; Lowry JC; Mommaerts MY; Howaldt HP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 34(6):366-77. PubMed ID: 16859914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Infrared digital imaging of the equine anterior segment.
    McMullen RJ; Clode AB; Gilger BC
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 19261169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital photography for rhinoplasty.
    Galdino GM; DaSilva And D; Gunter JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Apr; 109(4):1421-34. PubMed ID: 11965003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The characteristics of pressure injury photographs from the electronic health record in clinical settings.
    Li D; Mathews C; Zhang F
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Feb; 27(3-4):819-828. PubMed ID: 29076271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical considerations in dermatologic photography.
    Lakdawala N; Fontanella D; Grant-Kels JM
    Clin Dermatol; 2012; 30(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 22902218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a methodology for the standardisation and improvement of 'Smartphone' photography of patterned bruises and other cutaneous injuries.
    Biggs PR; Evans ST; Jones MD; Theobald PS
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23937947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.