These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22447453)

  • 41. Chemicals and environmental history.
    Jas N
    Ambix; 2014 May; 61(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 24964502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Why the historic deal to expand US chemical regulation matters.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7605):18-9. PubMed ID: 27251255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Principles of assessing health and environmental risk in view of directives issued by the EEC].
    Krajewski JA; Indulski JA
    Med Pr; 1994; 45(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 8084265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Problems faced when evaluating the bioaccumulation potential of substances under REACH.
    Ehrlich G; Jöhncke U; Drost W; Schulte C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Oct; 7(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 21438133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Options for the regulation and control of the environmental impact and human health consequences of chemicals in the European Union.
    Mason R
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1997; 19():113-22. PubMed ID: 9079199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Beyond REACH: roadblocks and shortcuts en route to integrated risk assessment and management of chemicals.
    Assmuth T; Hildén M; Craye M
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3954-63. PubMed ID: 20347473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Draft DG SANCO document: addressing the new challenges for risk assessment--an industry perspective.
    Campbell P; Dohmen P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e81-4. PubMed ID: 23564648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Socio-economic analysis for the authorisation of chemicals under REACH: a case of very high concern?
    Gabbert S; Scheringer M; Ng CA; Stolzenberg HC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Nov; 70(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 25220186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Multilateral environmental agreements for wastes and chemicals: 40 years of global negotiations.
    Koloutsou-Vakakis S; Chinta I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21049988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The present situation and future perspectives of the management of chemicals in Japan].
    Mukaide T; Inadera H
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2010; 52(4):157-71. PubMed ID: 20543533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparing REACH Chemical Safety Assessment information with practice-a case-study of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in floor coating in The Netherlands.
    Spee T; Huizer D
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Oct; 220(7):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 28711304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comments on pesticide risk assessment by the revision of Directive EU 91/414.
    Balderacchi M; Trevisan M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Mar; 17(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 20013065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Towards a proportionality assessment of risk reduction measures aimed at restricting the use of persistent and bioaccumulative substances.
    Oosterhuis F; Brouwer R; Janssen M; Verhoeven J; Luttikhuizen C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 28548694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In silico models for predicting ready biodegradability under REACH: a comparative study.
    Pizzo F; Lombardo A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():161-8. PubMed ID: 23796884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Carbon dioxide removal is not a current climate solution - we need to change the narrative.
    Ho DT
    Nature; 2023 Apr; 616(7955):9. PubMed ID: 37016122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Toward the definition of specific protection goals for the environmental risk assessment of chemicals: A perspective on environmental regulation in Europe.
    Brown AR; Whale G; Jackson M; Marshall S; Hamer M; Solga A; Kabouw P; Galay-Burgos M; Woods R; Nadzialek S; Maltby L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 27243906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A new integrated in silico strategy for the assessment and prioritization of persistence of chemicals under REACH.
    Pizzo F; Lombardo A; Brandt M; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
    Environ Int; 2016 Mar; 88():250-260. PubMed ID: 26773396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials.
    Powers CM; Grieger KD; Hendren CO; Meacham CA; Gurevich G; Lassiter MG; Money ES; Lloyd JM; Beaulieu SM
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():660-8. PubMed ID: 24176714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The regulation of hazardous chemicals: role of ecotoxicology in decision making.
    Vighi M
    Biotherapy; 1998; 11(2-3):105-11. PubMed ID: 9677041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.