173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22447477)
1. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.
Ayodele OE; Sanya EO; Okunola OO; Akintunde AA
Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Mar; 23(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 22447477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recordings in the hypertension patients followed up in primary care clinics.
Shuai W; Wang XX; Su H
Clin Exp Hypertens; 2018; 40(8):758-761. PubMed ID: 29400573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in end digit preference for blood pressure and associations with cardiovascular outcomes in Canadian and UK primary care: a retrospective observational study.
Greiver M; Kalia S; Voruganti T; Aliarzadeh B; Moineddin R; Hinton W; Dawes M; Sullivan F; Syed S; Williams J; de Lusignan S
BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e024970. PubMed ID: 30679298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. End-digit preference and the quality of blood pressure monitoring in diabetic adults.
Kim ES; Samuels TA; Yeh HC; Abuid M; Marinopoulos SS; McCauley JM; Brancati FL
Diabetes Care; 2007 Aug; 30(8):1959-63. PubMed ID: 17485575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with hypertension in primary care clinics: Minhang study.
Wang Y; Wang Y; Qain Y; Zhang J; Tang X; Sun J; Zhu D
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Apr; 20(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 25415589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digit Preference in Office Blood Pressure Measurements, United States 2015-2019.
Foti KE; Appel LJ; Matsushita K; Coresh J; Alexander GC; Selvin E
Am J Hypertens; 2021 May; 34(5):521-530. PubMed ID: 33246327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value: implication for hypertension screening.
Niyonsenga T; Vanasse A; Courteau J; Cloutier L
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2008 May; 10(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 18453792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zero and Five End-Digit Preference and Blood Pressure Quality of Care Revisited.
Yaseri M; Afarideh M; Hosseini M; Yousefifard M; Rafei A; Koohpayehzadeh J; Asgari F; Etemad K; Gouya MM; Noshad S; Bagheri M; Ataei N
Arch Iran Med; 2017 Oct; 20(10):633-639. PubMed ID: 29137464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends and transient change in end-digit preference in blood pressure recording: studies of sequential and longitudinal collected primary care data.
Alsanjari ON; de Lusignan S; van Vlymen J; Gallagher H; Millett C; Harris K; Majeed A
Int J Clin Pract; 2012 Jan; 66(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22171903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Terminal digit preference and single-number preference in the Syst-Eur trial: influence of quality control.
Wingfield D; Cooke J; Thijs L; Staessen JA; Fletcher AE; Fagard R; Bulpitt CJ;
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Jun; 7(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 12131074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
Burnier M; Gasser UE
Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard?
Kim JW; Bosworth HB; Voils CI; Olsen M; Dudley T; Gribbin M; Adams M; Oddone EZ
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jul; 20(7):647-9. PubMed ID: 16050862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland.
Parker RA; Paterson M; Padfield P; Pinnock H; Hanley J; Hammersley VS; Steventon A; McKinstry B
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e019431. PubMed ID: 29391369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
